Dismissed¶¶24

Jeevraj Yadav v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

Telangana HC19 Nov 2025CRP/3027/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP No. 3027 of 2019; High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; Jeevraj Yadav v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and Raj Kumari Dave; Article 227 petition challenging trial-court order dated 27-08-2019 in I.A.No.1932 of 2019 in O.S.No.3534 of 2010 (VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad); stay application under Section 151 CPC; suit disposed of on merits 23.02.2023; no appearance by revision petitioner or counsel at hearing; CRP dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; decision date 19-11-2025.

What did the court decide?

Since nobody appeared for the revision petitioner when the matter came up for hearing, the petitioner appeared not to be evincing any interest to prosecute the case. ¶¶23

Jeevraj Yadav Vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3027 OF 2019

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating and pertaining to order dated 27-08-2019^passed in 1.A.No.1932 of 2019 in 0.S.No.3534 of 2010 on the file of Vl Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and set aside the same as highly illegal and unlawful by allowing the CRP.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Jeevraj Yadav, son of Late Khammulal Yadav, Aged about 65 4ars, occupation Busi ness, r/o H. No. 1 4-5-3 1 S,Shahinayatg unj, Hyderabad.

¶10

... Petitioner/Plaintiff

¶11

AND

¶12

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner having its office At Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

¶13

Raj Kumari Dave, wife of Rajendra Prasad Dave, Aged about 56^years, occupation Household, resident of H^. No.14-1¹ -634, Shahinayatgunj, Hyderabad

¶14

... Respondents/Defenda nts/Respondents

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^{pleasedto stay} all further proceedings in O.S.No. 3534 of 2010 on the fil of Vl Junior^Civil Judge,City Civil Court, Hyderabad^pending disposal of the above^Revisionand pass

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. Manik Lal Yadav

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T.V.Rajeevan

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA 7

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Today when the matter has come up before this court for hearing, n()ne appeared for the revision petitioner. However, the casestatus information pertaining to the suit before the trial Court, placed before this court shows that the said suit was disposed of on merits on 23.02.2023.

¶23