Civil revision petition against an interlocutory order in a pending suit was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTHDAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NARSINGRAO NANDTKONDA
ctvtL REvlslo N NO: 1931 F 2021
Petition Under Article 227 constitutionof lndia, aggrievedby the Order dated 16.11.2020 lA.No.2 of2O2O inOS. No.394of 2020 on the file of the Court of the V Addl. Junior Civil Judge,Prohlbitionand ExciseCourt at Khammam'
Between:
AIIID
IANOz 1OF 2O21
Petition under section 151 cPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased to pleased to grant stay of all furtherproceedingsin o.S.No.394/2020on the file of the Court of the V AddlJunior Civil Judge,. Prohibition and Exciseat Khammam, pending disposal of the Revision andpass.
Counsel lbr the Petitioner(s):SRl.SUJATHA KURAPATI Gounsel lbrthe Respondents:SRINIVASA RAO MADIRATU
The Gourt made the following:ORDER
THT HON'BLE SRI JIISTICE NARSING RAO NAITOTXONDA crvru RpvtsioupprtrtoN ro.tggt of 2ozt
ORDER:
when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits t]:at cause in the present revision petition does not surwive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall
$tarldclosed.
Sd/. S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT 6REGISTRAR
/ffRUE CAPy/I
SECTION OFFICER
To,
w
Y'R
\ \
HIGH COURT
NNR, J
DATE:D i1811112025
<br>ItrE S
()a 1 6 l{,'i}{ 2026
.
ORDER
GRP.lNo.1931 of 2021
DISMISSING OF THE CIV]L REVISION PETITION AS ]NFRUCTUOUS
t
0t\ +
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nunna Rama Rao
Nunna Srinivasa Rao
Bandi Sulochana
Eedara Nageswar Rao
Narsing Rao Nandikonda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
