Civil revision petition challenging dismissal of an interlocutory application for default was disposed of. The Court held that restoration of such applications is futile once the main suit reaches final hearing stage, as interim remedies lose significance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION N O: 2899 OF 2025
Petition under Nlicle 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that rn the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 29-09-2023 passed by the principar District Judge, Karimnagar, in lA No.156 of 2014 in OS No.51 of 2014
Between.
Safdar Practitioner, Mrrza, R/o. H. S/o. Mirza No. 1 1- Liyaqat'6- '666/4, Ali ReJBaio. Hills, Hyderabad, aged 53 years, Rep.Occ by Legalhis General Power of Attorney Holders. .
2 K\aLa Yousufuddrn S/o. Raheemuddin age 35 years, Oc Business, Rl/o. H_ no.6- 3- 3'14, Khanpura, Karimnagar.
.. Petitioner/Plaintiffs
AND
... Respondents/Defendants
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. MD.Fasiuddin
Counsel for the Respondent No4: SRI K.Ashraf
The Court made the following: ORDER
f..,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUNARAMJT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2899 OF 2o25
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition has been frled assailing the docket order dated 29.O9.2023, whereby I.A. No. 156 of 2Ol4 in O.S. No. 51 of 2014 was dismissed for default.
2
i
NTR"J crp Io.2899 2025
7 . It is a settled principle of law, as er-r I rciated in A. Venkatasibbiah Naidu u. S. CheLloppon l(2OOOl 7 l,CC 6951, that interlocutory applications are intended to prese- e the subject matter of the suit pendente lite and that such interir , remedies lose their. signilicance once the main suit reaches th: stage of frnal adjudication.
3
NTR.J crP_ 0.2899 2025
revision petitioners/plaintiffs to avail appropriate remedies as available in law before the triai court, this civil Revision petition is
disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- T.SRINIVASAREDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// \
CTION OFFICER
To,
'w
JAlPSL
n
HIGH COURT
DATED.14t1112025
ORDER
CRP.No 2899 of 2025
1 ) ) I _q
.)-'1 1 | t'lttg :il;,s
i
'.,' i3rrr,r..r-..
CIVII- REVISION PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
Ks rcl>lz-e
1 issue framed by the court
Whether restoration of an interlocutory application dismissed for default serves any meaningful purpose when the main suit has reached the stage of final hearing?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
A. Venkatasibbiah Naidu v. S. Chelloppa NaiduReferred¶35
A. Venkatasibbiah Naidu u. S. Che Lloppon l(2OOOl 7 l,CC 6951
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Safdar Practitioner, Mirza
Sardar Avtar Singh
Sardar Sajjan Singh
Sardar Kushwanth Singh
Sardar Chalanpal Singh
Mohammad Mustaq Hussain
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
