Writ petition sought a mandamus directing completion of investigation and filing of final report in FIR No.99 of 2017. Police reported the final report was already filed as undetected. The court held the grievance stood addressed and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13217 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMEER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8046 0F 2018
Between:
Yadandla Gattaiah, S/o.Poshamallu Aged about 51 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o.Gattupally, H/o.Kondampet Vitlage Mathar Rad Mandal, Kaiimnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2"d respondent in completing the investigation and filing final report relating to the F.l.R No.99 of 2017 dt.24.10.2017 on the file of 2nd Respondent in respect of the Complaint dL24.1O.2017 made by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to complete the investigation and file final report in respect of the F.l.R.No.99 of 2017 dt.24.1}.2017 on the file of 2nd respondent
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the ci.. umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou.r may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to comprete the investigation rnd fire finar report relaling to F.lR.No.99 of 2017 dt.24.10.2011 on the file of lre 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. K. SURI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: SRI D. PRADEEP ,!(,p FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.3:--
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No.8046 OF 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief:
"- . -fo rssue a writ, order or direction, more parlicularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaing the inaction of the ld respondent in completing the investigation and filing final repoft relating to the F.l.R. No. 99 of 2017 dt.24.10.2017 on the file of ld Respondent in respect of the Complaint dt. 24.10.2017 made by the petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal, and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to comptete the investigation and file final repoft in respect of the F.l.R. No. 99 of 2017 dt. 24.10.2017 on the file of 2'd respondent and fo pass such other order or orders. . ."
2
rernains for consideration in this writ petition.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shal ;tand closed
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- S. IilqLLIKARJUNA RAO ASI; STANT REGISTRAR //, -/,!+ SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRt. R. 2 Two CCs to Gp FOK. SURI, Advocate [OpUCl R HOME .High Couit tor ftie State of telangana at Hyderabad IOUT) 3 Two CD Cobies'
BM BM
ak
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1311112025
ORDER
Ir E S
(
oot il 2 lj Afi 2t}26
l) \TC
WP.No.8046 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS tI FRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
o
CO?
6
PS,.
\o
c*'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police could be directed to complete investigation and file a final report in FIR No.99 of 2017 when a final report had already been filed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yadandla Gattaiah
State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Station House Officer, Koyyur Police Station
Shanigram Ramesh
N.Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
