M/s. Sri Vedakshara Movies, v. M/s. Nagashekar Movies
Case brief
What is this about?
Article 227 limited grounds of interference; jurisdictional error, palpable perversity, manifest procedural impropriety; Civil Revision Petition 163 of 2025; Telangana High Court; Justice Sujoy Paul; II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court Hyderabad; attachment before judgment; refusal to extend interim injunction/attachment order dated 07.01.2025; Section 151 CPC extension application; Order XXXIX Rule 5 modification/vacation; Order XXXIX Rule 4 pending; suit for recovery Rs.4 crore; security by sale deeds Rs.72 lakh; film 'Saryu Weds Geetha-2' release; Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil; plausible view; dismissed; no costs.
What did the court decide?
Interference under Article 227 is permissible only on limited grounds — jurisdictional error, palpable perversity or manifest procedural impropriety; the mere possibility of another view is not a ground for interference.