Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda dismissed two Civil Revision Petitions under Section 115 and 151 CPC as infructuous on the submission that the underlying cause did not survive for further adjudication. No order was made as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTfOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos: 1543 AND 1 613 0F 2021
CIVIL REVI S ION PETITION NO: '1543 OF 2021
Petition under Section 115 of CPC, aggrieved by the Order dated 3011212019 passed in EP No.477 of 2019 in dispute No.137 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the ll Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy.
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS'JDR NO. 1, 2 & 5/ OPPONENTS NO. JDR NO. 1,2& 3
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstanc€s stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High Court may bepleased To stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.477 of 2019 dated.3011212019 in dispute No.137 of 2015 on the file of the ll Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddypending hearing if the main CRP.
//
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. A L RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. P DURGA PRASAD
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1 613 0F 2021
Petition under Section 1 15 of CPC, aggrieved by the Order dated 3O11212019passed in EP No.476 of 2019 in dispute No.136 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the ll Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy.
Between:
C Veera Venkata Sai Kumar, S/o. C.Sathyanarayana, A,/a.48yrs., Occ.Business, R/o.'1-1-1 11/'1l33, Plot No.33, Shivapuri Colony, Kapra, ECIL, R R District.
,..REVISION PETITIONER/JDR NO. 4/OPPONENT NO. 4
AND
IA NO: 1 0F 2021
Petrtron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No. 476 ot 2019 dt.3011212019 in dispute No.136 of 2015 on the file of ll Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy, pending hearing of main CRP
Counsel for the Petationer:SRl. A L RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRl. P DURGA PRASAD
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
t
THE TION'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA Ciwil Revision Petitlon Nos. 1543 and 1613 of 2O2l COMMON ORDER:
Today when the matters were taken up for hearing, Sri Moin lrfan, learned counsel representing Sri A.L.Raju, learned counsel for the revision petitioners submits that the cause in these two Civil Revision Petitions does not survive for further adjudication and has become infructuous.
SD/- K.AMMAJI DEPUTY REGIST
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER J
To, t The ll Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy 2 one CC toSri. A L Raju, MvocateIOPUC] i one cc toSri. P Durgi Prasad, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CDCoPies.
PM/PSL
Fr
HIGH COURT
DATED:0911012025
COMMON ORDER
CRP.Nos.1543 and 1613 of 2021
ihE s
o
.J
t 0 2 i..i 20zE
*
,li
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS AS INFRUCTUOUS
G ,€b
&."
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the subject matter of the civil revision petitions has ceased to exist for adjudication.
Whether the civil revision petitions should be dismissed as infructuous.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Veera Venkata Sai Kumar
V. Anil Kumar
M/s Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd
Narsing Rao Nandikonda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
