Two civil revision petitions challenging interlocutory orders in O.S. Nos. 10 and 9 of 2014 were taken up for hearing; counsel for the petitioner submitted the cause did not survive and had become infructuous.
None granted; both civil revision petitions dismissed as infructuous, no order as to costs, miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3443 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE T\A/ENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1732 and 1542 OF 2021
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: '1732 ot 2021
Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order dated O41312020 Passed in l.A. No.1359 of 2019 in O.S. No.10 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Princlpal district Judge at Nizambad.
Between:
J.V.R. Kishore Babu, S/o. Sri J.Chitti Babu, Aged about 55 yers, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Flat No.305, SMR Vinay Elegance Apartments, Keshav nagar, Mettuguda, Secunderabad -500 017.
...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Plaintiff
AND
...RespondenVDefendant No.1
'/
/
...Respondents/Proposed Parties
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.10 oi 20214 on the file of Principal District Judge, at Nrzamabad, pending disposal of the above C.R.P.,
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.R.Manohar, Advocate Representing SRI P. VENKATESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V.RAVI KIRAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 1542 ot 2021
Petition under Arlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the Order daled 041312O20 Passed in I A No.961 of 2019 in O.S. No.'10 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal district Judge at Nizambad.
Between:
J.V.R.Kishore Babu, S/o. Sri J.Chitti Babu, Aged. 55 years, Occupation. Business, R/o. Flat No.305, Q\llR Vrlay Elegance Apartrnehts, Keshav Nagar, Mettuguda, Secunderabad - 500 0'17.
...Petitioner/Res pondent No.2
AND
,..RespondenUpetitioner
.//
...Respondents/Proposed Parties
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased togrant stay of all fu(her proceedings in OS.No.9 of 2014 on the file of Principal District Judge at Nizmabad, pending disposal ofthe above CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.R.MANOHAR, Advocate Representing SRI P.VENKATESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V.ROHITH
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
I //
/')
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CTVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.1732 and 1542 of2O2l
COMMON ORDER:
When the matters are taken up for hearing, Mr.P.R.Manohar', Iearned counsel representing petitioner
submits that cause in these revision petitions does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
As a sequt:I, raiscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- M.NAGAMAN ASSISTANT REGI
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
M,
NVB/PSL
HIGH COURT
DATED:2311012025
COMMON ORDER
CRP.Nos.1732 and 1542 ot 2021,
1 TIE S
o
(_) 3 1 JAN 7rl7f, ()7-
<br>* *
DISMISSING BOTH CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS AS INFRUCTUOUS
1
W
\au
2 provisions across 2 enactments
J.V.R. Kishore Babu
Satyanarayana Vyas (died) per Legal Heirs
Deen Dayal
Sunil
Jagan
Smt. Leela Devi
Narsing Rao Nandikonda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
