Dismissed¶¶24

Vasam Prasad v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC13 Oct 2025CRLRC/756/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; CRLRC/Criminal Revision Case No.756 of 2022; Vasam Prasad v. State of Telangana and Vasam Gouthami; revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.; challenge to order dated 28-03-2022 in Crl.M.P.No.350 of 2021 in DVC.No.11 of 2020; Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vemulawada; Rajanna Sircilla District; domestic violence case; stay petition I.A. No.1 of 2022 under Section 151 CPC; Lok Adalat settlement; dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed; Justice K. Sujana; order dated 13-10-2025.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the dispute between the parties has been settled before the Lok Adalat, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. ¶¶24

Vasam Prasad Vs The State of Telangana and another — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 756 OF 2022

¶7

Criminal Revision case filed under Section 397 and 401 of CR.P.C aggrieved by the order dated 28 03 2022 passed in Crl.M P.No.350 of 2021 in DVC.No.11 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial [\rlagistrate of First Class at Vemulawada.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Vasam Prasad, S/o Rajamallu, aged about 33 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. H.No.9-1-15, Markandeyanagar, Venulawada Town and Mandal, Rajanna Srrcilla District.

¶10

...Petitioner/Respondent No.1

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad,

¶13

Vasam Gouthami, Wo. Vasam Prasad, aged about 38^years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Narsrngapoor Village of Chandurthy Marpal, Rayanna Sircilla District, presently residing at H.No.9 1-15, Markandeyanagar, Vemulawada Town and Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District.

¶14

...RespondenUPetitioner

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section^'l 51 CPC praying tnat in thd tircumstances stated in the affidavit f iled in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto stay of all further proceedings in Crl M.P No.350 of 2021 in DVC^{No.'1 'l} of²⁰²⁰ on the file of the Junior Civil Judge-Cum-J udicial Magistrate of^First Class^at Vemulawada, including appearance of the^{petitioner,pending disposal} of^the above Criminal Revision Case, in the, interest of^justice

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SMT.^{JUSTICEK. SI JANA}

¶21

CRIMINAL REVISION^{CASE No.756 of '.,O22}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

When the matter is taken^{up for hearing,: -r E Ganesh,} the learned Assislant^{Public Prosecutor,suL r rits that the} dispute between the^{parties has alreadybecn a I ical)l]' settled} before thc Lok^{Adalat. Hc furthersubmitstha trt vtcu' of Lhe} said settlement, the^{prescntCriminalRevLsi} 'll^{Case has} become inlructuous and^{does not slln'l:lfol- further} adjudication.

¶24

Recording the submission of^{learned,A;;islernt Public} Prosecutor, this Criminal^{RevisionCase islismissetl as} infructuous.

¶25

Miscellaneous applications, il^{any pencli:} l,^{shall stand} closed.

¶26

SD/.^). GOWRI^SHANKAR )EPUTY REGISTRAR :3

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Junior^{CivilJ udge-cum-Jud icia I tVlagistrateof Firslllass at Vemulawada} 2 Two CCs to^{the Public Prosecutor,High Court for the S ate of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶31

: one cC to^{SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPtJtl}

¶32