Dismissed¶21

Mallepula Laxman Goud v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Oct 2025CRLP/12835/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; CRLP/Criminal Petition 12835 of 2025; Justice K. Sujana; Section 482 BNSS anticipatory/bail petition; FIR No. 68 of 2025, Gandhari Police Station, Kamareddy District; accused already arrested; dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed; petitioner's counsel N Ravi did not appear; Asst. Public Prosecutor E Ganesh for State.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner (Accused No. 5) had already been arrested and is in custody, the Criminal Petition seeking his enlargement on bail is dismissed as infructuous. ¶21

Mallepula Laxman Goud Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12835 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Itlallepula Laxman Goud, S/o tt/I. Shiva Goud, aged about 43 years Occ Toddy Business, r/o H. No. 1- 181621N1 Sai Nagar, Saloor village and lVlandal, Nizamabad District

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 5

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Through S. H. O , Gandhari Police Statron, Kamareddy District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad

¶12

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner herein on bail in the event of their^arrestin connection with FIR No.68 of 2025 of Gandhari Police Station, Kamareddy District

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^{Sri N RAVI} (None Appeared), Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. E Ganesh, the learned Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶17

CRIMIIIAI, PETITION t'Io.12835 ci 2)'.ZS

¶18

CRDER:

¶19

ni, L'.t].,:rcsli, learned Assistant Public Proseculor,^{o</sup> instructions, sutrmit[cJ ti'rat rhe peLitioner accuseil No.5 herein has already been arresled. Therefore, the Crimina! Pe ition has become infructuous.}

¶20

2- None erppe ,rrccl on behalf ol the petitioner.

¶21

Having cr,rsidered lhe submission madc b1,- the learned Assistanr- Public Prosecutor that rhe petitioner is already in cr,rslody, this Crirninal Pc'tition is herebv dismisse d as infruci -lous.

¶22

Miscellane:us applications, if any pending, shall stand closeci.

¶23

SD/- M.NAGAMANI ASSilSTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Judicial Fjrst Class lVagistrate at yellareddy. 2. The Station llouse Officer, Gandhari police Staiion, Kamareddy District 3. One CC to SRI N RAVI Advocate [OpUC] 4 Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECIJTOR,^-High Court fc r the State of Telangana [OUI I

¶29