Petitioners arrayed as accused in a dowry harassment case under Section 85 BNS and Sections 3 and 4 Dowry Prohibition Act sought dispensation of their personal presence before the trial court on every adjournment, citing hardship to employment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
oF TELANGANA rN rHE H|GH "or*IfB$otffoBHE
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL PETITIONNO: 9785oF 2025
Between:
...Petitioners/AccusedNo'2 to 6
AND
Petition undersection 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay bepleasedtoquashtheproceedingsagainstthepetitioners/accusedNo-2to6 in c.c.No. 114 ol2025on the file of the lll Addl. JUnior civil Judge cum XXV Addl. JudicialMagistrateof First Class at Rajendranagar'
/}
i
l.A. NO: 2 oF 202s
Petition under section 528 0f BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to stay a, further proceedings incruding personar appearance of the petitioners/A 2 to 6 in c.c-No.114 0f 2025 0n the fire of the ,r Addr. Junior civir Judge cum xxv Addr' Judiciar Magistrate of Frrst crass at Rajendranagar including appearance of the petitioners/Accused No.2 to 6 pending disposar of the above criminal petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusin g the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. MOHAMMED ASLAM, Advocate for the pe titioners and Mr. JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, Additionai pubtic prosecuto r (TG) on behalf of respondent No.1
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
.ra\
I il
THEHONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N' TUKARAMJI PETITIONN o.9785o t2025 cRtMINAL
ORDER:
Thispetition is filedseekingquashment of the C'C'No '114 of 2025onthe file of the lll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XXV AdditionalJudicial Magistrateof First Class' Rajendranagar' against thepetitioners/accusedNos 2 to 6'
4 Learnedcounselfor the petitionerswould submit that though thepetitionersare resolvedto face the proceedings' theirpresence before thetrial court on each adjournmentis causingsevere hardship andeffecting their employment'Therefore' prayedfor dispensingtheir personal presence unlessit is requiredfor the proceedingsand such direction would redress their grievance' f-
l
N]R, J Crlp_9785-2 o25
7 With the above direction, this Criminal pelilion is Cisposed of
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- L,VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECT ON OFFICER
To,
RC/PSI
I I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 04t0Bt2O2S
ORDER
GRLP.No.9785 of 20ZS
o (i. i/.<br>)
tll 10 sEP 2025
\ -'l
t'*{'"-' - - -'
This Criminal Petition is Disposed of.
Lq lo,r
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether personal presence of accused Nos.2 to 6 in C.C.No.114 of 2025 could be dispensed with subject to conditions.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Abdul Jabbar
Asiva Begum
Rasheeda Begum
Saida Begum @ Saida Anjum
The State of Telangana
Samreen Begum
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
