Allowed

Mohammed Salman Mohammed v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Aug 2025CRLP/9123/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner accused under Sections 308(2) and 351(2) BNS filed IAs seeking recording of compromise with the de facto complainant and quashing of FIR No.110 of 2025, Nizamabad. After Legal Services Committee verified the parties' identity, the Court allowed the IAs, permitted compounding, and quashed FIR proceedings subject to payments.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.110 of 2025 proceedings quashed; IAs 3 & 4 allowed; conditional payments of Rs.10,000 total directed.

Mohammed Salman Mohammed Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

|³⁴⁴⁴ )

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶4

AT HYDERABAD

¶5

TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶8

l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025

¶9

In/and

¶10

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9123 OF 2025

¶11

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9123 OF 2025

¶12

Between:

¶13

Mohammed Salman Mohammed, S/o. Late [/ohammad Sayeed Mohammed, Age 34 years, Occ. Student, R/o H.No. 9-1-198, Quilla road, lahwar road Nizamabad. Nizamabad District.

¶14

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶15

AND

¶16

1 The State of Telangana, through SHO P.S. Town Vl, Nizamabad, Represented by the Public Prosecutor. High Court of Telangana.

¶17

2 Mohd. lmran, S/o Mohd Kareem, Age.29 years. Occ. Cab driver, R/o H.No.920-2047 , Usmania Masjid, Auto Nagar Nizamabad

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No.1 10 of 2025, dated 25 04.2025 on the file of P.S., Vl Town Nizamabad, Nizamabad District against the Petitioner.

¶20

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No.110 of 2025, dated. 25.04.2025 on the file of P.S., Vl Town Nizamabad registered for the offence under Sections U/sec 308(2) 351(2) BNS. including the appearance of the Accusdd till the disposal of the Main Quash Petition.

¶22

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶23

Between:

¶24

Mohammed Salman lVlohammed, S/o. Late Mohammad Sayeed ltilohammed, Age. 34 years, Occ Student, R/o H.No. 9-1-198, Quilla road, lahwar road Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.

¶25

... Petitioner/Accused in LA.ir{os.3 and 4 of 2025

¶26

AND

¶27

1 The State of 1-elangana, through SHO P.S. Town Vl, Nizamabad, Represented l:y the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana.

¶28

... RespondenUComplainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025

¶29

2 lr4ohd. Imran, Sio lrlohd Kareem, Age.29 years, Occ. Cab driver, Rio H.No.920-2047, LJsrr,ania tvlasjid, Auto Nagar Nizamabad.

¶30

Rers po n dents/De-facto Complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025

¶31

Petition urder Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit if any Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to recorl the compromise statement and quash the F.t.R No.'1 10 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Vl Town Nizamabad, in the interest of^justice

¶32

l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025

¶33

Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit if any affidavit an Joint Memo and Petition, the High Court may be pleased to granl permission to record the compromise statement and quash the F.l.R No.'l 1O of 2025 on the file of P.S. Vl Town Nizamabad.

¶34

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Crimina Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Srushman Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri Shravan Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶35

The Court made ther following: ORDER

¶36

I I

¶37

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA

¶38

l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ini and CRIMINAL PETITION No.9123 ol2o25

¶39

ORDER

¶40

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences

¶41

Vide order dated 22.07.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report

¶42

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 05.08.2025 and the same is placed on record

¶43

ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.l10 ol 2025, dated 25.04.2025 on the file of Vl Town Nizambad, Nizambad District against the petitioner/accused is hereby quashed subject to the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand

¶44

¶45

ETD, J Crl.P 9123 2O25

¶46

Only) to the Director,^{Sainik Welfare,Hyderabad(Savings} AJc.No.52188926?-79, State^{Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070),} IFSC Code:SBlN0O2007O,^{MICR No.500004057) and Rs 5,0001(Rupees} Five Thousand only)^{to the TelanganaHigh cou( Advocates Association,} Hyderabad, within^{a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proofof} the same before the^Registry.

¶47

Miscellaneous applications,^{if any pending, shall stand closed.}

¶48

Sd/. P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA i]EPUTY REGISTRAR

¶49

,TRUE COPY'

¶50

I <br>'tr ECTION OFFICER

¶51

To,

¶52

The ll Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nizamabad

¶53

2- The station House Officer. Nizamabad Vl Town Police Station, Nizamabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶54

One CC to Sri N Srushman Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶55

One CC to Sri Shravan Kumar Advocate IOPUC]

¶56

Two CD Copies

¶57

ADK/PSL

¶58

Along with a oopl of Joint mcmo of compromise

¶59

Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri N Srushman Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 12-08-2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance vide USR No. 89497 ol 2025 dated 26-08-2025.

HIGH COL'RT

DATED:12,10A2425

ORDER

l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 In/and CRLP.No.9123 ot 2025

¶64

<br>lrr I ti--
I ) 01rov6
)?i
t {
ITAICHeO_

¶65

ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.NOs.3 & 4 OF 2025

¶66

¶67

¶68

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD .

¶69

¶70

I.A.No. oF 2025 IN CRL.P.No. oF 2025 1a)

¶71

BETWEEII]:

¶72

Mohammed Salman Mohammed S/o. Late Mohammad Sayeed Mohammed. Age: 34 years, Occ: Student, R/o H.No. 9-1-i98, Quilla road, Jahwar road Nizamabad, Nizamabad District

¶73

... Petitioner/Accused

¶74

AND y)'

¶75

The State of Telangana, through SHO P.S. Town 4 Nizamabad, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana.

¶76

Respondent/Complai nant

¶77

Mohd. Imran S/o Mohd Kareem, Age: 29 years, Occ: Cab driver, R/o H.No.9-20-2047, Usmania Masjid, Auto Nagar Nizamabad.

¶78

....Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶79

JOINT MEMO

¶80

May it please your lordship,

¶81

f . it is to submit that the allegation of the complaint is that on 25-04-2025 At 19:00 hours one Slaman who is advocate belongs to NRI colony came to the complainant and told that his car was involved in Sonar Amzadh POSCO Cases. he threatened saying that he will implicate complainant in the case if he did not give Rs 30,000/. For which complainant gave Salman Rs 10,000/- but Salman warned him to give remaining amount or else he would implicate a^pOSCO Case against complainant.

/-s\ @

It is submitted that the Respondent no.2 herein lodged a complaint before Police Town-Vi Nizamabad against^pe:titioner herein and the Police Town-VI Nizamabad registered a case in Cr.No.i10/2025, Dt: 25.04.2025 for the offences under sections U/sec 308(2) 3s1(2)BNS.

¶86

I submit that on the intervention of the well wishers and elders of the both parties, They settled the matter amicably out of the court. That due to the said reasons, The 2nd Respondent came forward to withdraw the complaint for which 2nd Respondent also executed an Affidavit stating that he is ready to withdraw the above said case.

¶87

It is submitted that the matter is settled out of the coud, I am ready to withdraw the case against the petitioner considering all the above circumstances this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the F.I.R No.110 of 2025 on the file of P.S. VI Town Nizamabad, otherwise the petitioner and his tamily members will suffer irreparable loss.

¶88

It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and quash the F.I.R No.110 of 2025 on the file of P.S. VI Town Nizamabad, in the interest of justice and^pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case

¶89

Hence, this loint Memo HYDERABAD DATE: 17.07.2025

¶90

d\ ) Cou nsel for petition I -0?-Aoa\ Wct I Mc{^, tccLyalt petitioner C Counsel for Respondent Wffi

Mohammed Salman Mohammed v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Salman Mohammed v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Badamm Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Akhil Pasha Vs State of T.G.

Mattam Saroja Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammod Sirajuddin@Siraj Shareef Vs State of Telengana

Smt M. Jayarani Vs The State of Telangana

Maddelabanda Suresh alias Siddu alias Suresh Babu Vs The State of Telangana