Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings under Sections 448 and 506 IPC arising from matrimonial discord between petitioner No.1 and her husband, the de facto complainant. The Court declined to interfere since the case was pending trial since 2022, directed expeditious disposal, dispensed personal appearance if represented by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3444 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE -
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA -
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10228 OF 2025.
Between:
AND
RESPONDENT/DEFACTO.COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.185B of 2422 dated 29/1012022 on the file of the X Addl. Chief Metropolitan [,4agistrate at Secunderbad, registered Under Sec.448, 506 of IPC -
l.A. NO: 2OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BSNN praying that in the circumstances stated rn the l.rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petjtion,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.1 858 of 2022 daled 29-14-2022 on the frle of the X Addl. Chief [t4etropolitan l,4agistrate at Secunderbad, pending disposa oF the above Criminal petition .
l'
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing llre Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arg.rments of Sri J RAJESWAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No1 . and none appear for the Rescondent No2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICETIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10228 ot 2025
ORDER
2
Ero,l a,tP No.10224 2425
thus, the allegations leveled against them do not attract any offence and hence prayed to quash the proceedings against lfr€m
3
D - L. LAKSHMI BABU PUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
il)
AG/gh
HIGH COURT
DATE D : 1 210812025
ORDER
.,/','-=':-
./_ /:_t'.)'.-
- c)r '
2E tit 20n
: \-.
CRLP.No.10228 of 2025
CRLP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
q
(
o.-
qr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 448 and 506 IPC against the wife and her brother, arising from matrimonial disputes, should be quashed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt M. Jayarani
Bala Rayudu
The State of Telangana
K. Siva Prasad
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
