Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Manmohan Singh Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2025
Manmohan Singh Vs The State of TelanganaManmohan Singh v. The State of Telangana

Disposed¶20

Manmohan Singh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Feb 2025CRLP/911/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Revision Case No. 911 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, bench: Smt. Justice Juvvadi Sridevi, dated 05.12.2025 (show cause notice before admission). Petitioner: Bala Kishan s/o Mallaiah (counsel: Immaneni Rama Rao); respondents: State of Telangana through Public Prosecutor; Puliari Yadagiri s/o P Lakshmaiah through GPA Dusari Laksmaiah (second respondent/complainant); Dusari Laksmaiah s/o Bayanna. Revision under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. against order dated 28.07.2025 in MP No 5712/24 in CC No 596/2020 of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at Ibrahimpatnam, arising from Crime No 292/2022 dated 27.09.2022 in which the petitioner was co-accused. Notice issued to respondent Nos.2 and 3, personal service permitted, case posted to 22.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Issue of notice to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to show cause why the Criminal Revision Case should not be admitted; personal service permitted; case posted to 22.12.2025.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Issue of notice to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to show cause why the Criminal Revision Case should not be admitted; personal service permitted; case posted to 22.12.2025.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., seeking to set aside the order in MP No 5712/24 in CC No 596/2020 dated 28.07.2025 (Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at Ibrahimpatnam), should be admitted.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Show cause notice before admission in Criminal Revision Case No. 911 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Smt. Justice Juvvadi Sridevi), dated 05.12.2025, filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. Petitioner Bala Kishan, S/o Mallaiah, arraigned as co-accused in Crime No 292/2022 dated 27.09.2022, seeks to set aside the order dated 28.07.2025 in MP No 5712/24 in CC No 596/2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at Ibrahimpatnam; the second respondent Puliari Yadagiri (represented by GPA Dusari Laksmaiah) is the complainant, and Dusari Laksmaiah is the third respondent. Upon hearing Sri Immaneni Rama Rao, Advocate for the petitioner, the Court ordered issue of notice to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to show cause why the Criminal Revision Case should not be admitted, permitted personal service, and posted the case to 22.12.2025. No issue was decided; the document records no holding.

A

13257 1

(sHow cAUSE NOTTCE BEFORE ADMtSSION) II'd T'$-IE }.IIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

RIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TW'ENTY FIVE

:PRESENT:

t i{H Fl,3NOl.iR,qBLE SMT'JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIM'NAL REVISION CASE IrlC): 911 OF 2025

r:V(;i € Fl -icr;el [3ala Kishan, S/o l/lallaiah

Petitioner

AND

I ir,.: ::ierte of Telangana, through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of I ei;an{lana, Hyderabad

i'.. F'uiari Yadagiri, S/o P l-akshmaiah, R/o H No 1-4018, Agapally Village, l,4an,:hal lVlandal, Ranga Reddy District Telangana, Represented by his GPA [)us;lri Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, R/o H No 1-6, Agapally Village, l/anchal i\1rnq,;r :ri i:ianga Reddy lf istrict

I . Dusili-i Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, R/o H No^'l-6, Agapally Village, [Vlanchal l\rlanrl;rl, Ranga Reddy District

Respondents

!til-l[:r"ll-AS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate Sri lmmaneni ;,ri.:r [lirc irrcsented this Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., i:' ,iniJ l.hart in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in i^i::f )ort of tl^re CriminalRevisionCase, the High Courl may be pleased to set aside :'' li,;i6;f irr ()r ivlP l\o 5712A24 in CC No 596/2020 dated 2810712025 on thefile of l, -lJitiri: ;rl ,judicial lVlagistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at lbrahimpatnam , : I i ::i t',,: iird i'esponderrt a co-accused in Cnnre Nc 29212022 dated 27 .09.2022 :!^; : r):6s(:ril ll'rt; 2nd respondenucomplainant.

Itt{D ',iV}IEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed i, , iir a,rrcl r.,pr:n hea"ing the arguments of Sri lmmaneni Rama Rao Advocate for the iii.; r,:r, :^'i:,:;ted i,isue of notice to the Responclent Nos.2 and 3 herein to show i: ,ie as 16, rrrhv this CRIMINAL REVISION CASE should not be admitted.

'r''$r,r viz.:

Pu.ia;'i ';rdagiri, S/o P i-akshmaiah, R/o H fJo 1-4018, Agapally Village, h1;:rri,:^'ai lilantlal, Ran.r;a Reddy District Teiangana, Represented by his GPA []r.:r;;,r'1 L-al<srnaiah, S/o Ba5r36n6, R/o H No^'i-6, Agapally Village, [/anchal Lt;ar,i.rl Flanga Reddy District

.i. f)usari Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, R/o H No 1-6, AgapallyVillage, [t/lanchal Ii4;nn,:l;rl, Ranga Reddy District

lr^.icr,.i:,,: r.] inow cause i)F ci before 22.12.2A25 tc which date the case stands . e I ;s i: 'ru'hy in the circumstances set out irr the petition and the affidavit filed i^'ii':,J,, ilh ir:c:y enclosed) this CRItUINAL REVISION CASE should not be admitted.

r I I Ci::,,ii,''l n'rade the following l^:lli:ir:

L,i:sufi rrotice ro respondent Nos.2 and 3

F'+)i's;c,nal senrice is also permitted.

L is t r-,r:^{',22.12,2025.}

SD/-r..IAYASRIiE ASSTSTANT REGISTR,A}I

//TRUE COPYI/

5 OFFICER

F'u.iarr Yadagiri, Slo P I akshmaian, R/o H ]lo 1-4018, Agapally Village, [\1ar]ci al Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Telangana, Represented by his GPA t)usari Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, R/o H No 1-6, Agapally Village, l/anchal I"{;arr,i;rl Ranga Reddy District

[)r;r;ari l-aksmaiah, Slo Bayanna, R/o H No 1-6, Agapally Village, l\4anchal I/tr;n rr:l :rl,,Ranga Reddy District

(;iFl^'1 tc 2 by SPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)

One CC to SRI IIVIUANENI RAMA RAO Advocate [OPUC] /.1. l'vvo CC:s to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate [OPUC] l ()i'rr: ,:1:are coDy

; ', ,⁽ ] ,;'i i:^ti],lJ RT

r : t.J'f : []r rrJriS/,'fi 2 12025

i{^r,"}l'trt"l Hr: IHB H F^.-;l ii?E ADMISSION

{:iiil1, }Ql{-11, i[,lm.t$"i^'t of 2025

ir;-i
1
ff:f"j''' irD
+
ili ,' 1('t
i.'.P.,<br>:.ir./t,
=_.,.I.-+r nfsp
-"qk=:s=

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., seeking to set aside the order in MP No 5712/24 in CC No 596/2020 dated 28.07.2025 (Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at Ibrahimpatnam), should be admitted.medium confidence¶13

Statutes considered

2 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Cr.P.C.397¶13 401¶13

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 28.07.2025 in MP No 5712/24 in CC No 596/2020, which the petitioner seeks to have set aside in this revision.¶13
Learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at Ibrahimpatnam · 28.07.2025
Prior proceeding
Crime No 292/2022 dated 27.09.2022: the petitioner was arraigned as a co-accused and the second respondent is the complainant.¶13
Prior proceeding
The second respondent figures as the complainant in the said crime.¶13

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Bala Kishan, S/o Mallaiah¶6
Immaneni Rama Rao
respondent
State of Telangana, through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad¶9
Public Prosecutor
respondent
Puliari Yadagiri, S/o P Lakshmaiah, R/o H No 1-4018, Agapally Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana (represented by GPA Dusari Laksmaiah)¶10
respondent
Dusari Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, R/o H No 1-6, Agapally Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District¶17

Coram

AI extract

Juvvadi Sridevimember¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 5 Feb 2025 · February
Registered: 23 Jan 2025
Case no.: CRLP/911/2025
CNR: HBHC010037982025
Bench: K. Sujana
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: Criminal Revision Case

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K. Sujana

Arsha Shivanna Vs Arsha Gouramma
4 Feb 2025
Vollavotu Mallesh Vs The State of Telangana
4 Feb 2025
Asaduddin Owaisi, Vs Ms. Nowhera Shaik
4 Feb 2025
Syed. Shah Ghouse Mohiuddin Hussain Quadri, Vs The State of Telangana
5 Feb 2025
K. Nithu Bai Vs The State of Telangana
5 Feb 2025
Hantal Gobardhan @Govardhan Vs State of Telangana
5 Feb 2025

Cite this judgement

Manmohan Singh v. The State of Telangana, CRLP/911/2025 (TEL), decided on 5 February 2025.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes2

Cr.P.C.397 · 401

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Order dated 28.07.2025 in MP No 5712/24 in CC No 596/2020, which the petitioner seeks to have set aside in this revision.Learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy at Ibrahimpatnam · 28.07.2025
Crime No 292/2022 dated 27.09.2022: the petitioner was arraigned as a co-accused and the second respondent is the complainant.
The second respondent figures as the complainant in the said crime.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Juvvadi Sridevi

Parties & counsel