Petitioner sought quashing/stay of criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of appearance and representation by the petitioner.
Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I )
[3385 ]
I I I I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
I'ONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 9081 0F 2014
Between:
Annabathula Naoeswar Rao(Al) S/o.. Late Rathaiah, Aged about 6i years, R/o. H.No. 2-6-1506, Bhavani ttjgar, Hanama'tonol'W"rangrr.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of cr. p c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal-pelition, the High C;ft ;;y;; pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A.l in cc No. 24gt2o13 on the file of the court of the lll Nletropolitan Magrstrate, Cyberabad at LB Nagar.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2o14lCRLPMP. NO :8779 OF 2O141
Petition under Section 482 of cr. p c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crrminar peiition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including app&rarrce of 'the Petitioner/A1 in c c.No 24\tzo13 on the frte ot tne corrt of ilie Hl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Mernorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Vivekananda Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the pub/ic prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and none appeared for the Respondent No.1.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IIONOURABLESMT. JUSTICEK. SUJAN'A
C:RIMINAL PETITIONNo.9O81of 2Ol4
ORDER:
Sinrxrhele was no representationon behalfr I 1leitioner on the e arl(' oc:casion,the matter, which pertainst( :lOI4, was directed to lre listed todayunder the caption 'For [)isrnissal'' Even t,rda!, there is norepresentation onbet alf ofthe petitioner I is cresumed thatthe petitioner is not i'rterr stcd to proceed u'ir lr th<: criminalpetition.
HerL< t' tL.e Criminal Petitionstands dismissrrc f( )r non-
prosecutio;t
Misc:1 an,:ous petitions, if any,pendrng: h:rll stand
closed.
i
SD/- I/IOHD.ISMAIL PIJTW REGISTRAR : /ITRUECOPY// .! SE,CI-ION OFFICER
To,
1 Thelll Mert orrolitanMagistrate'Cyberabad at LB Nacler' , il; ;i;ii;';- our;e officer' Police Siatron UppalHvderal'ad (our) 3 Two CC,st0 t re I)UBLICilnoslcuronHigh Courl.at H rc er rhad ; onl6i,j,,.-Cr vvEKANiNDAREDDYAdvocate[oPLjc] 5. one cot,: s,RlPASHAT'r rnisH r'rn REDDY Advocate[cpLc] 6. TwoCD CoI es I pk/Bq
I )
HIGH COIJRT
DATED;1Qt[0"212025
,1 rr_ S14
yt
,/J
"l
li:I ) (n
1-
2
ll3 ,ttlt, tgfi
.o
.+ . * {
\ 1':" ot.'
'iO
ORDER
CRLP.No,9081of 2014
CRIMINAIL. PETITION IS DISMISSE'D FOR
NON PROSECUTION
$ {
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Annabathula Naoeswar Rao
G. Drakshyamma
The State of A.p
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
