Dismissed¶44

Maxcure Nutravedics Ltd. v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Feb 2025CRLP/8371/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court dismisses quash petitions Crl.P.Nos. 8371 & 8378 of 2018 as infructuous after trial court disposed of underlying C.C.No. 258 of 2018 (Kalwakurthy; drugs prosecution by Drugs Inspector, Nagarkurnool); accused included M/s Maxcure Nutravedlcs Ltd., Khyali Dutt, Parveen, Dheeraj Kumar Arora, Neena Vivek, Akansha Arva; Section 482 Cr.P.C. invoked; related I.A. under Section 528 BNSS to recall non-bailable warrants; no ruling on merits, limited citational value.

What did the court decide?

None; both criminal petitions dismissed as infructuous and miscellaneous petitions, if any, directed to stand closed. No merits of the quashment request were decided. ¶44

Maxcure Nutravedics Ltd. Vs the State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

132511

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NOS: 837 1 and 8378 OF 2018

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8371 OF 2018:

¶8

Between:

¶9

I . lvl/s- Maxcure Nutravedlcs Ltd, Office at #-13, Sector-64, llE, Sidcul, Haridwar, Uttarakhand-249403 Rep. by Khyali Dutt, Occ.Wholetime Director

¶10

1. Khyali Dutt, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Wholetime Director, R/o. C-6, Subhashnagar, Jwalapur, Haridwar-249407

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 & 3

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Drugs lnspector, Nagarkumool, Through its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated ln the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Courl may be pleased to call for the records in C.C.No. 258 of 2018 on the file of the Honorable court of Principal Junior civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kalwakurthy against the Petitioners and quash the same.

¶16

(Prayer amended as per Court Order dated 19l1Z|Z0Z3 in l.A.No.1 ol 2e23 in Crl.P.No.8371 of 20181

¶17

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2018 in Crl..P.No.8371 ot 201B

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in C,C. No.258 of 2018 on the file of the Honorable Court of principal Junior Civil Judge cum Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kalwakurthy pending disposal of the above Criminal. Petition.

¶19

-ai

¶20

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 in orl..P.No.8371 of 2018

¶21

Petition under ljection 528 of BNSS^praying that in the^{;ircumstances} stated in the [/]enroran lum of Grounds of Crimrnal^Petition,the I^{gh Court may be} pleased to recall the r on-bailable warrants issued againsl the [relitloners in^CC No 258 of 2018 on the file of Judicial First Class [Vlagistrate,^{l(alw rkurthy,dated} 04112t2024, pending^(lrl P No B378 of 2018,^pending befor,-'^{this Hcn ble Court,in} the interest of l ustice.

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8378 OF 2018

¶23

Between:

¶24

Parveen^{c6n1, aged} aboul 42 years, Occ: Additiona Diret;to , R/o. Flat^No 555, ll Floor Pc c,ket 6, Sector-2, Rohini, New Delhi - 1 100U5

¶25

Dheeraj Kumar Arora, Aged about 36 years, Oc,:: dirr.'ct rr, R/o. L-16, Sriniwaspuri Nernr Delhi - 110085

¶26

Neena Vivek, I'rled about 38 years, Occ: Director R/o. llrC f loor H-l/135136, Secto-16. Flohini, New Delhi -^'1 10085

¶27

Akansha Arva, l\ged about 31 years, Occ: Director,^?,1o.22-7 .laipur House Colony, Sahahagranj. Agra, Uttar Pradesh - 282010

¶28

...PETITIONER/ACCUSE'D No.2, 4 to 6

¶29

AND

¶30

The State of Telangan r, Rep. by its Drugs lnspector, Nagarkurnool Tlrrough its Public Prosecutor, Hlg r Couft at Hyderabad

¶31

..RESPONDENT

¶32

Petition uncler liection 482 of Cr.P -C praying that in the ;ircumstances stated in the [/lernorar dum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the H gh Court may be pleased to call for the records in C.C.No. 258 o'f 2018 on the^frle of the Honble Court of Principal - trnior Civil Judge cum Judicial [t/agistrate First CIass, Kalwakurthy against t r= Petitioners and quash the same.

¶33

(Prayer amended as 1:er Court Order dated 1911212023 in l.A.Nrr.1 of 2023 in Crl.P.No.8378 of 2013)

¶34

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2018 in Orl..P.No.8378 of 2018

¶35

Petrtion uncler^(iection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the ;ircumstances stated in the [t/lenrorarr, lum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the -l gh Court may be pleased to grant stay :f all further proceedings including the appe arance of the petitioners in C.C No ?-58 of 2O18 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of Principal Junior Crvll Judge crm Judicial First Class I,4agistrate, Karwak rrthy pending disposal of the above Oriminal Petition.

¶36

l.A. NO: 1 o F 2024 in Crl..P.No.83 78 of 2018

¶37

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the lVtemorandum of Grounds of Criminat F"iiirr. inf ni;h ;;;;';ry be pleased to recail the non-bairabre warrants issueo against the petitioners in cc No 258 of 2018 on the fire of principar .lrnio.. cirir Judge cum Judiciar First crass MaEistrate, Karwakurthy, dated^'oqnziozi, pending crr.p.No.8378 0f 2018, pending before this Hon,ble Court, rn the i;terest of justice.

¶38

These Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lMemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon tre"a'rint trJ arguments of sri N. Naveen Kumar' Advocate for the petitioners in both" crips ano sri M. vivekananda Reddy, Assistant^pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent in both crr.ps

¶39

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶40

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDEII:}

¶41

C:r[.P.Nos.837l^{&8378 0F 2018}

¶42

coM MON^ORDER:

¶43

Leartred l.ssistant^{Public Prosecutorsub:lits; :hiit the} caseshavr:be:r-rdisposedoffintheCourtbelou',:Lssuch' the causr: rn^{criminal petitions does notsur"'ivefor} adjuclication^{arLd has become infructuous'}

¶44