Dismissed¶41

Smt. Salma Begum v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Feb 2025CRLP/6228/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Criminal Petition No. 6228 of 2019, Justice K. Surender, decided 19-02-2025. Quash petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against proceedings in C.C.No.45 of 2013, XV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad (accused Nos. 2 to 4; petitioners from Borabanda/Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District). Dismissed as infructuous after Public Prosecutor reported petitioners already acquitted; cause did not survive; I.A. No. 1 of 2019 (stay) and miscellaneous petitions closed. Keywords: 482 Cr.P.C., quash, acquitted, infructuous, C.C.No.45 of 2013.

What did the court decide?

None - the Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous (petitioners having already been acquitted); miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed. ¶41

Smt. Salma Begum Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE^{NINETEENTHDAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENWFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO: 6228 OF 2019}

¶7

Between:

¶8

l.Smt.SalmaBegum,WoSyedAsfaqAhmedAgedabout.35Yrs,occ.Housewife' nio-a_+_iiilA/Bt, praUathn-agar, sai'Baba Tempte, Borabanda, Balanagar Ranga Reddv District

¶9

, s;;_i'A;hi;o nnmeo, Sio Abut^{Hussain syedAged about. 40 yrs, occ. BusinessRio} ' d:;4;fiNAA, Fiiorf,n"grr, sai Baba Tehple,Borabanda, Balanagar Ranga Reddv

¶10

District

¶11

a. 5v-eJ trrroinuddin,^{S/o Syed Nazeer Aged about. 34 Yrs, Occ-Busness No 3-187l2lA'} - n6,tvunrgir, New Hafe'ezpet, rirumalasiri' ,ll3r.Tifl5'-??,t51iccusED. No. 2 to 4

¶12

AND

¶13

1 . The State^{of Telangana,Rep.By its Public ProsecutorHigh court for the state of} Telangana At^HYderabad

¶14

z smi. SiiiOa^{Beq'um,WoNizamuddin Aged about. 28 Yrs, Occ' HousewifeFl/o} H'No 19-4-281/E/16'^{Jahanuma Hvderabad}

¶15

...RESpoNDENTs/coMpLATNANTS

¶16

Petition under Section^{482 of cr.P .c praying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{Memorandumof Grounds of criminalPetition,the High courtmay be} pieasea to^quash the^{proceedings against the petitioners2lo 4 in n c.c.No.45of} lota on the^{file of XV Addl.chiefMetropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.}

¶17

t.A. NO: 1 OF²⁰¹⁹

¶18

Petition under Section^{482 of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may be} ;i;;;J^{to stay alt furtherproceedings inctuding the appearance of ..the} ietittnersln-Z^{to + in C.C.Uo .4s of 2013 on the file of XV Addl. Chief Metropolitan} fuajistrate at^{Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above criminalpetition.}

¶19

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of^{criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri T. Prasanna} Kumar, Advocate^{for the Petitionersand sri M. Vivekananda Reddy,learned} Asst. Public^{Prosecutor(TG) on behalfof the RespondentNo'1 and None} appeared for^{the ResPondent No.2.}

¶20

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENI)ER CTTIMINAL PETITION N0.6228 0F 2019

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor on verification subrnitt,:d that the petitioners / acr:rrsed Nos.2 to 4 were already acquitt,:d Therefore, the cause in thc present petition does not survive.

¶24

2 . Recording t he above submission, the criminzLt petition is dismissed as irrl'ructuous.

¶25

Miscellaneor-rs Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶26

Sd/. V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANI REGISTRAR

¶27

//TRUE COPY//

¶28

To,

¶29

ii ;:> 'JsE:c'noN oFFtcER U