Allowed

Perala Hari Hara Krishna v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Jul 2025CRLP/8133/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An accused in custody for a murder charge under IPC Sections 302 and SC/ST (POA) Act sought interim bail to sit for his B.Tech supplementary examinations. The State did not oppose. The court granted interim bail from 04.07.2025 to 03.08.2025 on bond and surety conditions, requiring surrender on 04.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail from 04.07.2025 to 03.08.2025 with personal bond of Rs.25,000 and two sureties; surrender on 04.08.2025.

Perala Hari Hara Krishna Vs State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶2

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8133 of 2025

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the

¶5

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) by the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking bail in S.C.No.387 of 2023 on the file of the on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Offences under SC/ST (POA) Act-Cum-VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

¶6

The brief facts of the case are that on 24.02.2023, the petitioner voluntarily surrendered before the Abdullapurmet Police and stated that as the deceased was interfering in his love life with his girl friend, he murdered the deceased by taking him to the nearby bushes at the outskirts of Pedda Amberpet Municipality on 17.02.2023. Hence, a case was registered vide Crime No.119 of 2023 before the Abdullapurmet Police, Vanasthalipuram and after completion of the investigation, a charge sheet was filed vide S.C.No.387 of 2023 on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Offences under SC/ST (POA) Act-Cum-VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with 109, 202 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

¶7

¶8

Heard Mr.P.Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 24.02.2023, causing difficulty to appear for his B.Tech Semester Exams. He further submitted that the petitioner needs to appear for the B.Tech supplementary Exams which commences from 05.07.2025. He also submitted that the petitioner is willing to furnish sureties as directed. Hence, he prayed the Court to grant interim bail to the petitioner for attending his B.Tech supplementary Exams.

¶10

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the same of granting interim bail to the petitioner for enabling him to appear for his B.Tech supplementary Exams.

¶11

Considering the submissions made by the both the parties, since the B.Tech supplementary exams of the petitioner was scheduled from 05.07.2025 to 02.08.2025, this Court is inclined to grant interim bail to petitioner from 04.07.2025 to 03.08.2025 subject to the following conditions:

¶12

(i) The petitioner/accused No.1 shall be released on interim bail from 04.07.2025 to 03.08.2025 subject

¶13

¶14

to the executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent.

¶15

(ii) The concerned Jail Superintendent is directed to ensure that this order is complied forthwith.

¶16

(iii) The petitioner/accused No.1 shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent on 04.08.2025.

¶17

(iv) The petitioner/accused No.1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 483(3) of the BNSS).

¶18

(v) Registry is directed to communicate this order to the concerned Jail Superintendent.

¶19

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed.

¶20

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶21

____________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J

¶22

Date:03.07.2025 vsl

Perala Hari Hara Krishna v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perala Hari Hara Krishna v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rathod Santhosh Sure Vs The State of Telangana

Sri P. Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Jahangeer Vs Smt.Shaik Shabeera Begum

Lasetti Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Soudi Chandrashekar Vs The State of Telangana

Allam Satish Babu Vs The State of Telangana