Disposed

Soudi Chandrashekar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Jul 2025CRLP/8057/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS in a cheating case under BNS offences punishable up to seven years. Without examining merits, the court directed them to appear before the investigating officer, who must follow Section 35(3) BNSS and Arnesh Kumar guidelines, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

No bail granted; petitioners directed to appear before the investigating officer by 10.01.2025 subject to Section 35(3) BNSS and Arnesh Kumar guidelines; no costs.

Soudi Chandrashekar Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰³ J

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREE.NIVAS RAO

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8057 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Soudi Chandrashekar, Sio._Soudi Kalyan, Aged about 34 years, Occ. private Service, R/o. H. No. 3- 6- 28, Sriram MohailalZaheerabad,'Medak Diatrici.^---

¶9

2 Dasari Sai. Pavan Kumal S/o. Srinivas, Aged about 30 years, Occ. private Service,_R/o. H. No. 1- 10, Annavaram, Snkhavaram Mandal, East GoOiviii Andhra Pradesh.

¶10

3 Gandu Nagaraju, Sio. Gandu Venkata Narayana, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Private Service, R/o. H. No.3- 103, Ach-aryulu Gudem, Chilkirr Mindal, Bethavole. Nalgonda District.

¶11

Bhumireddy Mahendra, Sio. Bhumiredd y Malakondaiah, Aged about 45

¶12

years, Occ. Private Service, R/o. H. No. 2- 62, Peda Alavala Padu. Prakasham Dist, Andhra Pradesh.

¶13

Kondlapudi Ramesh, S/o. Kondlapudi Rafnanareddy, Aoed about 40 vears. Occ Privale Service, R/o. H. No.^{,l70a, yeturu,} Chejaila, Nellore, Ahdhra Pradesh - 524345.

¶14

Sangala Kiran Kumar Reddy, S/o. Sangala Hanumanth Reddv. Aqed about 1?.years,^{Occ. Private Seivice,R/o. H. No..1- B, Thirumdtaprir Viitige,} Chinnakonta Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶15

Dongari Satish, S/o. Dong_ari, Lingamurthy, Aged about 39 years, Occ. private lervice,^{R/o. Plot.No._2-1Q,V=inayaka- Na-gar, Dundigai,} GahdimisammJ, Bahadurpally, Malkajgiri Diskict.

¶16

B. Vemula [91u,.S19 Vemula Agamaiah, Aged about 37 years, Occ. private Service, R/o. H. No. , Nizampet-, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶17

Chippld_a Lakshmana Satish_ Kumar, S/o. Chippada Siva Brahman, Aged a.bout 37 years, Occ. Private Service, R/o. H. No. 2- 258, Rajula Ramalayim, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh.

¶18

...Petitioners/A4, A5, A6, A8, A10 to A14

¶19

AND

¶20

The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Hiqh Court of for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶21

...RespondenUCom plainant

¶22

_.,=

¶23

Petition^rrnde r section⁴⁸² of^{BNSS praying tha'. in the circumstances} stated in the Mer.rrorrrrdum^{of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the Figh Court may} be pleased to 0rar.^{z nticipatory bail to the petitioners/ lt4' lt5} '^{lt6, A8, A'10 to} A14 in the event^<_f :heir arrest^{in crime No. 70/2025CenlralCrime station,} Hyderabad Dt 13,/01/:1025 Offences^{U/Sec. 316(4) 336 (3tR/vv 61 2) of BNSand} order immediate r'? :3se of the^petitioners.

¶24

This Petiticrn^r; rming on for^{hearing, upon perusirgthe IVlemorandumof} Grounds of Crinriral Petition^{and upon hearing thelrgumentsof} Sri M Saleenr A(l/r)cate for^{the Petitionerand Sri Syed Y lsar l\tlamoon,} Additional Public Irr-csecutor^{on behalf of the Respondent.}

¶25

The Court made thr:^{fcllowing:ORDER}

¶26

I I

¶27

The on'ble Sri lustice I.Sreenivas Rao Criminal Petitio No.8057 of2025

¶28

Order

¶29

This Crirrrinal Pedtion is filed by the peutioners/accused Nos.4, 5, 6, 8 10 to 14, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of Bharattya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita @NSS), in ccrnnection with Cnme No.70 of 2025 on the file of Station I Iouse^(Jffjcer, Cenrral Crime Srarion, Hyderabad, registcred for thc offences punishabie under Sections 316(4) and,336(3) r/rv Section 61(2) of tsharariya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS)

¶30

Ileard Mr. M.Saieem, learned counsel for the pcridoners/accuscd Nos.4, 5, 6, 8, 10 to 14 and Mr. Syed yasar N{amoon, learned Addirional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State.

¶31

During the course of heating, ir is brought to the norice of this Courr that the offences levelled against the

¶32

petitioners/accused Nos.4, 5, 6, 8, 10 to 14 are punishable with lmpflsonment upto seven years.

¶33

¶34

ln r'e..,' r' the samc, without goingrirto tLre treritr of the

¶35

CASC, tl.n:^('. :^,-u r deems it appropriate¹ o dl:t ct the

¶36

petiuonc|s,/i.L(:cr.s(r.1 Nos.,1,5,6,8, 10 to 14 to apr)eal bclore thc inr.csti{rrt n 5 officer on or before 10.01 .21)25^(tn such appea-rancc ,r{ t[rc: pctitioners/accused Nos.4, 5 6., 3. 1:l to 14, the inl'es^r-ip,,rr tt r r I olficcr shail scrupulousllr [6liot', th,: prrcedure contempl: t'cl^,rrrclet Section 35(3) of RNSS an<l th,: er iclelines issucd br' :hr' \pex Court in Arnesh Kumar vr;. Sltate of Biharl.

¶37

It is Lrr:Lct clear that the pctitioners/accus.ecl \or..1. -5,6, 8, 10 to 1^-l :,1'Lrl coopcrate rvith the investigating5 of.icer for thc tnr.cstigatiorL rr r.l tnake themselr.es available to thc i n.c ;trgadng officcr as ;r : tl rvhcn re quired and also p ior-r clc the inforn-ration /'r I cuments AS sought by him to conclrdc the lnvcstlgat1()rr

¶38

If ther petitionets/accused Nos.4,5,^(r,8, 1() ro 14lail to cooperate^'irrir 1r tbe inve stigating officer for inr.estisat ion, the

¶39

'1zor+;^{8 scc :;:}

¶40

¶41

inr.estigating officer is at liberty to take action^{against the}

¶42

petitioners/accused Nos.4,^5, 6,8,^{1,0 to 1'4 in accordance with}

¶43

1au,

¶44

Subject to the abor.e directions, the Crirninal Petition^is clisposed o[. No costs.

¶45

As a sequel, misccllaneous petitions,^pending if^{any, stand}

closecl.

! i I I II I I I

\ \

To,

//TRUE COPY//

SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶52

SECTION OFFICER

¶53

'1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station police Siation, Hyderabad 3. Two ccs to the Pubrrc^prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶54

!,^{One CC to Sri M Saleem,Advocate} tOpUCl

¶55

5.' Two CD Copies o AB

HIGH COURT

DATED: 03107t2O25

ORDER

CRLP.No.8057 of :1025

¶60

,
i-<br>.$
$'
J-
*
4'1 ) Hf) i.J

¶61

DISPOSING OF IFIE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶62

0.lK

Soudi Chandrashekar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soudi Chandrashekar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rathod Santhosh Sure Vs The State of Telangana

Sri P. Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Jahangeer Vs Smt.Shaik Shabeera Begum

Lasetti Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Perala Hari Hara Krishna Vs State of Telangana

Allam Satish Babu Vs The State of Telangana