Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Basha @ Tatipala Madhu Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2025
Basha @ Tatipala Madhu Vs The State of TelanganaBasha @ Tatipala Madhu v. The State of Telangana

Disposed¶24

Basha @ Tatipala Madhu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Apr 2025CRLP/7766/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court (Sri Justice N. Tukaramji, 04/04/2025) disposes of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashment petition by four accused — Ratipala Madhu, Tatipala Anupama, M. Murali Krishna and Mrs. Sowjanya — in Crime No. 787 of 2023, Raidurgam P.S., Cyberabad (Sections 408, 420, 342, 384, 506 r/w 34 IPC 1860; Section 25(1-B)(a) Arms Act 1959). Charge sheet already filed (printed as 'C.C.No 32 g of 2025'); the Court did not quash at this stage and instead granted liberty to file an appropriate application challenging the precipitated proceedings; pending miscellaneous applications disposed. Proceedings pending before XIII Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of without quashing the proceedings; liberty granted to the petitioners to file an appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed.

Why is it important?

In view of the development that the charge sheet had been filed, and as the petitioners had to reconstruct and strategize their pleadings, the Court disposed of the criminal petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised. ¶24

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petition disposed of without quashing the proceedings; liberty granted to the petitioners to file an appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings in Crime No. 787 of 2023 of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad, against the petitioners (Accused Nos. 1 to 4) should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (with a companion prayer in I.A. No. 2 of 2024 to stay further proceedings including arrest).

Court's answer

In view of the development that the charge sheet had been filed, and as the petitioners had to reconstruct and strategize their pleadings, the Court disposed of the criminal petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad — Crl.P. No. 7766 of 2024 (with I.A. No. 2 of 2024), Sri Justice N. Tukaramji, dated 04/04/2025. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by Accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime No. 787 of 2023 of Raidurgam P.S., Cyberabad (offences: Sections 408, 420, 342, 384, 506 r/w Section 34, IPC 1860; Section 25(1-B)(a), Arms Act 1959), seeking quashment of the proceedings and stay of further proceedings including arrest. During hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet had been filed (case sheet number as printed: 'C.C.No 32 g of 2025'). Having regard to this development, and as the petitioners had to reconstruct and strategize their pleadings, the Court disposed of the criminal petition, granting liberty to file an appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed. No precedent was cited or relied upon.

A

13217 |

HIGH^{COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANAA'THYDERABAD} FRIDAY ,rHE^{FouRrHDAY oIllsl-L} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENW FIVE} PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI}

CRIMIN AL^{PETITIONNO: 7766oF 2024}

""T'B:;n, @^{ratipalaMadhu, s/o ratipala valme:ll^11?t-it"'lto:} I"ff i ifl:" Business,^{nlo. n. uo]il6olrlrr-"t*ig'0"'.Near.MoirLbadP'S'' R'R' D strict'}

1. Tatipala^{Anupama, ;/;:i;ti;;l;" Hlt'o1i'' A.'ed about46 Years' occ'} Business,^{wo' H tlo i'j6o' rtll''i'g'0"'Nearfroinabad P'S'' R'R District'}

1. M. Murali^{Krishna, S/;;;;ilin!9'} nseg about^{57 Years' occ General} Manaser^{in s B l , *Ji'g#iffi;t"Lit"i'i600 o28 R/o' FlatNo' 401'sR}

1. Etug"it Mrs.^{Sowjanya, Homes, Chandanagar' Hyderabad oi" ii 'rti""iriha Rao' Aged about} .^{36 Years' Occ Branch} -or'f"'Oi-' iii""n Citf Branctr' R/o Flat No" 401' SR

Manager,^{State eank} 'ir"g"-ni Hor.t' chandanasar' n'olltEii,oNERs/AccusED Nos.1 ro 4

AND

The State^{of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor'HighCourt of}

Telangana, Pradyumna^{HYderabad Chandrapatr' ''}

Telangana, Pradyumna^{HYderabad Chandrapatr' 'S/o Ch Prabhakar' Aged about 47 years' Occ'} Business,^{R/o Plot uo as]'i"'tn'niniHitt" Colony' Khaiaguda X Roads'} Raidurgam,^HYderabad

...RESPONDENT'COMPLAINANTS

Petition^{underSection 482 of Cr'P'C praying that in the circumstances} stated^{in the Memorandr#"tt.4.oi Criin"fFetition. the High Court may} to crime^{No. 787 o1 2023from the} be oteased^{to ca, for tn. ;;;#;;;ining} respondent^{No.2authority ;J;il;} th" t#u "= being arbitrary^{and illegal;}

I.A. N^O:,2OF2024 Petition^underS ection^{482 of Cr.P.CPrayrngthat in the circumstances} stated in^{the Memorand um of Grounds of Criminal Petition,theHighCourt maY} bepleased^{to stay all furtherProceedings includingarrest to the Petitionerstn} conn ection^{with Crime No' 787 of 2O23of P.S Raidurg am, Cyberabad;}

ThisPetitioncominoonforhearing,uponperusinotheMemorandumof Grounds^{of c.minal p"t*Ln"'"ni''il ;;;'l"s tf,e arotiments of sri VIJAY B} PARoPAKARI,^{Advocate ;tth;-P';iitl;";it} "io^{s'l JiihenderRao Veeramalla'} Addl. Public^{Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No- 1'} ftre Court^{madethe following: ORDER}

I

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI

CRIMINAL PETI TION N0.7766 of 2024

ORDER:

This criminal Petition is fired under Section 482 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,Cr.p.C.,.l973,) seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioners in crime No.7g7 of 2023 of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate

The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 4 in crime No.7g7 of 2023, registered for the offences punishabre under sections 408, 420, 342,384,506 read with Section 34 of the lndian penal Code. 1860 and Section 25 (1-B) (a) of Arms Act, j 959.

Learned Additionar^pubric prosecutor submits that charge sheet was filed against the petitioners and numbered as C.C.No 32 g of 2025. 4 Having regard to the deveropment in the proceedings and as the petitioners have to reconstruct and strategize the pleadings, granting liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised, this criminal petition is disposed of.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

slqsed. -

SD/. L. VIJAYA^LAXMI A SISTANT^REGISTRAR ,/TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

\

To, 1. The Xlll Addl.^{Metropolitan Magistrate'C-yberabadat Rajendranagar} i. rn" st tion^{House Officer, RaidurgamP S ' Cyberabad} i. o"L cE t.^{sRl. VIJAY B PAROPAKARI Advocate IOPUCI} 4. Two CCs^{to puBllc pno'securbc, Highcourt a[ Hyderabad (oUT)} 5. Two CD^CoPies t/

\ \

I , I I I tr ; I l I I a ; I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:04 t04tZO2S

I

ORDER

CRLP.No.7T66 ot ZOZ4

ar:.iitSfa
( \1 i.-r
1a
0 3 SEP 205
*
aF.,;pa r r -,,. '
--:--::;:;_-,-r'

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETTTION

La/,lt-'l g
{.4
?/2,45

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the criminal proceedings in Crime No. 787 of 2023 of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad, against the petitioners (Accused Nos. 1 to 4) should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (with a companion prayer in I.A. No. 2 of 2024 to stay further proceedings including arrest).medium confidence¶22
The court held
In view of the development that the charge sheet had been filed, and as the petitioners had to reconstruct and strategize their pleadings, the Court disposed of the criminal petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application to challenge the precipitated proceedings, if so advised.ratio¶24

Statutes considered

3 provisions across 3 enactments

AI extract

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973482¶22
Indian Penal Code, 1860Sections 408, 420, 342, 384, 506 read with Section 34¶23
Arms Act, 195925(1-B)(a)¶23

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Criminal proceedings in Crime No. 787 of 2023 of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, against the petitioners as Accused Nos. 1 to 4, whose quashment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was sought; charge sheet subsequently filed (case sheet number as printed: 'C.C.No 32 g of 2025').¶22
Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate; proceedings pending before the XIII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar
Prior proceeding
Registration of Crime No. 787 of 2023 for offences under Sections 408, 420, 342, 384, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, 1860, and Section 25(1-B)(a) Arms Act, 1959; petitioners arrayed as Accused Nos. 1 to 4.¶23
Prior proceeding
Charge sheet filed against the petitioners, as submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor during the hearing (case sheet number as printed: 'C.C.No 32 g of 2025').¶24
Prior proceeding
Further proceedings (post-charge-sheet C.C.) pending before the XIII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar, per the order's despatch/copy list.¶29

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Ratipala Madhu (Accused No. 1)¶5
Vijay B Paropakari
petitioner
Tatipala Anupama (Accused No. 2)¶6
petitioner
M. Murali Krishna (Accused No. 3)¶7
petitioner
Mrs. Sowjanya (Accused No. 4)¶8
respondent
The State of Telangana, through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad (Respondent No. 1)¶11
Jihender Rao Veeramalla
respondent
Pradyumna Chandrapatr (Respondent No. 2 / complainant)¶13

Coram

AI extract

Sri Justice N. Tukaramjiauthor¶19

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 4 Apr 2025 · April
Registered: 12 Jul 2024
Case no.: CRLP/7766/2024
CNR: HBHC010358032024
Bench: N.tukaramji
Disposal: DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Case type: Criminal Petition (CRLP)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from N.tukaramji

Sri. MahendrawadaAbhi Ram Vs State of Telangana
3 Apr 2025
P. Sridhar Vs The State Court of Telangana
3 Apr 2025
Kasthuri Prakash Vs The State of Telangana
3 Apr 2025
H. Akshay Vs The State of Telangana
4 Apr 2025
Poreddy Vijay Reddy Vs The High Court of Telangana
4 Apr 2025
Vangala Srinivas Vs the State of Tg
4 Apr 2025

Cite this judgement

Basha @ Tatipala Madhu v. The State of Telangana, CRLP/7766/2024 (TEL), decided on 4 April 2025.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes3

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973482
Indian Penal Code, 1860Sections 408, 420, 342, 384, 506 read with Section 34
Arms Act, 195925(1-B)(a)

View all statutes

Procedural history4

Criminal proceedings in Crime No. 787 of 2023 of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, against the petitioners as Accused Nos. 1 to 4, whose quashment under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was sought; charge sheet subsequently filed (case sheet number as printed: 'C.C.No 32 g of 2025').Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate; proceedings pending before the XIII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar
Registration of Crime No. 787 of 2023 for offences under Sections 408, 420, 342, 384, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, 1860, and Section 25(1-B)(a) Arms Act, 1959; petitioners arrayed as Accused Nos. 1 to 4.
Charge sheet filed against the petitioners, as submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor during the hearing (case sheet number as printed: 'C.C.No 32 g of 2025').

View full history

Bench / Coram

Sri Justice N. Tukaramji

Parties & counsel