Vangala Srinivas Vs the State of Tg

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^N.TUKARAMJI

¶5

CRIMINAL P ETITION NO: 4726^{OF 2025}

¶6

Between:

¶7

'1. Vangala Srinivas, Sio.sriramulu, Age.34 years' Oc-c.Business R/o H.No. 4-2l82lOpp.Police Station Lane, Koratla Town and^{Mandal KarimnagarDistrict,} Telangana

¶8

Vangala Sriramulu, Sio. Jayaramulu,^{Age 65 years,. Occ.Rtd Employee R/o} H.N6. 4-2-182, Opp.Policb Station Lane,^{KoratlaTown and Mandal} Karimnagar District, Telangana

¶9

Vanqala Pushpalatha, Wo. Sriramulu,^{Age.60 years,Occ. House wife R/o} H.N6.4-2-182, Opp.Police Station Lane,^{KoratlaTown and ltrlandal} Karimnagar District, Telangana

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{Public Prosecutor,High Courtfor the stateof} Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1,2 &3

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of Telangana, Rep, by^{Public Prosecutor,HighCourt for the State} of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶14

Respondent No.1

¶15

2 Vangala Harika @ Sanjali, Wo Vangala^{SrinivasAge.29 years' Occ House} . wifelR/o. H.No.4-2-182, Opp.Police^{Station Lane, KoratlaTown and Mandal,} Karimnagar District now at'C/o.^{En-a Kishan} ,^{r/o. Kummarikunta Vill, Julapalli} Mandal Telangana

¶16

RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFACTO^COMPLAINANT

¶17

Petition under Section 528 of^{BNSS, praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of criminalPetition, the High court may} be pleased to quash^{proceedingsin c.c.No.362 of 2016on the file the Judicial} First Class Magistrate^(special mobile)^{Karimnagar,at Karimnagar'against} Petitioners/Accused No.¹ ,2 and^3.

¶18

l.A. NO: 1OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 528 of^{BNSS, prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of criminalPetition, the Highcourt may} be pleased to^grant stay of all^{further proceedings including appearanceof} Petitioners/Accused 1, 2 & 3 in C.C. No. 362^{0t 2016 0n the file the JudicialFirst-} Class Magistrate (special Mobile)^{KarimnagaratKarimnagar,pending}

¶20

7

¶21

adjudication of the criminal Petition, this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶22

This Petition comrng on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KoNGARA RAJKUIVAR, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Jthender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No_.1 , and None Appeared for the Respondent No. 2.

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

1

t I

, I

THE HONOURABLE SRTJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI

¶28

CRIMINA LP ETITION No.4726 of 2025

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This petition is filed seeking quashmeit of the C.C.No.362 of 2016 on the file of learned Judicial First Class t\4agistrate (Special Mobile, Karimnagar at Karimnagar), against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3.

¶31

Heard Mr.K.Raj Kumar, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramafla, rearned Additionar pubric prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1_State.

¶32

The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos..l to 3 in C.C.No.362 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 49g (A), 506 r/w. 34 of lndian Penal Code,^.1g60 and Section 4 of Dowry and prohibition Act,^'1961.

¶33

Learned counser for the petitioners wourd submit that though the petitioners are resorved to face the proceedings, their presence before the trial Court on each adjournment is causing severe hardship and effecting their employment. Therefore, prayed for dispensing his personal presence unless it is required for the proceedings and such direction would redress their grievance.

¶34

Learned Additionar pubric prosecutor submits that there is no specific objection for the prayer, however pleaded for a direction for in

¶35

2

¶36

person presence of the petitioners in the material stages of the proceedings

¶37

Having regard to the submissions, subject to the^petitioners' appearance through their counsel on every. adjournment and the petitioners' personal appearance as and when directed by the Court, the personal presence of the^petitioners in the^proceedings of the C.C.No.362 of 2016 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobile, Karimnagar at Karimnagar), is dispensed with. Additionally it is specified that any lapse in abiding the above conditions would render this order ineffective.

¶38