Disposed

C.D.S.B.Venkata Rao and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC21 Feb 2025CRLP/7465/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC. The petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings and grant of stay pending disposal. The court noted a discharge application was filed below and allowed the petitioners to question its outcome.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed off with liberty to question the outcome of the discharge application filed in the trial court; miscellaneous applications closed.

C.D.S.B.Venkata Rao and another Vs The State of Telangana… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7465 OF 2019

¶6

Between:

¶7

C.D.S.B.Venkata Rao, S/o,C Shiva Raj, Aged 30 years, Occ: Advocate,

¶8

C.Padmavathi, Wo. C.Shiva Raj, Aged 50 years, Occ: House wife, Both R/o.H.No. 10-1 1 -17 1 lB1 12, Fathenagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad

¶9

...Petitioner/Accused No.1 & 2

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court at Hyderabad

¶12

Respondent

¶13

D.Babu Rao, S/o. D.Balra.j, Aged 35 years, Occ: Business,

¶14

R/o.H.No.'10-1 1-17'1 , Shivalayam Road, Fathenagar, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad

¶15

...RespondenU Defacto Complainant

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P -C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused No.'1 and 2 in C.C.No.28512016 on the file of Xl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Kukatpally, Cyberabad.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\Iemorandum of Grounds of Crimirial Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grani -stay of all further proceedings including Appearance of the Petitioners/Accused No.'l and 2 in C.C.No.285/2016 on the file of the Xl Additional Metropolitan [/agistrate Court at Kukatpally, Cyberabad till the d isposal of Crimlnal Petition.

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C.^Hari Preeth, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri lt/l- Vivekananda^Reddy, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.^1. The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

l I i

¶21

TITE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶22

C,RIMINAL PETITTON No. 7465 0F 2O1!)

¶23

ORDE II:

¶24

Thjs Cr minat petition is Iiled by the petitiore: seeking to quash prrrr:r,edings in C.C.No.2gS of 2016, on th: file of Xl Addition al Iv etropolitan Magistrate Court, a1 Kukatpally, Cl,berabac , F,.:mga Reddy District.

¶25

HearC the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Vivekan rnrla Reddy, learned Assistant public F,r-osecutor for responden.. S [;rte.

¶26

Learr ed :ounsel for the petitioner submits tlLal clischarge application hz,s; been filed in the Court below.

¶27

The r:rit,r| sought in the present petition is s mrrar to the relief sougl t irr the Court below. In the said c1r:u rstances, petitioner is at liberty to question the outcome of the discharge application.

¶28

With thr: said observation, the Criminal pr:tition 1S disposed off \1 scellaneous applications pending, it zny, shall

¶29

stand closed

¶30

Sd/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ls SISTAI\IT REGISTRAR //TRUE GOPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶31

To,

¶32

The Xl Adcitioral Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Kukertl:al y, Cyberabad 2. One CC lo Sr tl. Hari Preeth. Advocate IOPUCI 3. SnHbOlo Ihr.^Dublic Prosecutor, High Court foi the state <,f^'l elangana at Hyderabad IOfl$GJ Cour)

¶33

Two CD Cc ore i (k

HIGH COURT

DATED 211212C25

ORDER

:::-,:>
L.
<br>.?
.9 <br>.<br>- i,,i
q
\ i./^rj'i
{. c| //
(3 //
.i.: \ ' ,' ,.',1, * ),,,
'+*;.-.--/-

¶38

CRLP No.7465 of^210'19

¶39

CRIMINAL PE:--ITI()N IS DISPOSED OF

¶40

^da#r

C.D.S.B.Venkata Rao and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.D.S.B.Venkata Rao and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.a. Suneela, Vs The State Telangana

Smt. Salma Begum Vs The State of Telangana

Parveen Soni Vs State of Telangana

Syed Zaki Hussain Razvi Vs The State of Telangana And Another

Abhy Maheswari Vs State of Telangana

Nishant Vermon Vs State of Telangana