Dismissed¶39

Naresh Solanki v. Hameed Uz Zaman Khan

Telangana HC7 Feb 2025CRLP/7168/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Section 482 Cr.P.C.; quash; Crime No. 217 of 2019; Central Crime Station Hyderabad; dismissed as infructuous; stay of arrest; I.A. No. 2 of 2019; Naresh Solanki; Madhu Solanki; Hameed Uz Zaman Khan; Justice K. Surender; Telangana High Court; 07-02-2025. Single-judge order dismissing a 2019 quash petition as infructuous after counsel reported the cause no longer survives; a procedural closure record carrying no legal proposition and citing no precedent.

What did the court decide?

None; the Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous and pending miscellaneous petitions were directed to be closed. ¶39

Naresh Solanki Vs Hameed Uz Zaman Khan — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

i I i I I I I I l,i

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH^{DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENWFIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO:71680F2019}

¶7

Between:

¶8

l.NareshSolanki,S/o.LateTaraChandSolanki,agedabout44years,R/o.H. No. 6-3-550/3, Somajiguda,^{Hyderabad. (A-1)}

¶9

Madhu Solanki @^{NafeesaBegl1, Wo. Late.TaraChand.9-olanki, Aged}

¶10

;b"ri 6/t";rJ, n-lo. H. No. 6-3-f50i3, somajiguda, Hvderabad (A-2)

¶11

.PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

I HameedUzZamanKhan,S/o.LateKhursheedZamanKhan,Agedabout52 years, R/o. 11-5416t11B, Red^{Hills, Hyderabad}

¶14

2 ThestateofTelangana,Rep.byitsPublicProsecutor,HighCourtforthe stateofrelangana'tHyderabad ...RES'.NDENTS/..M'LA,NANi

¶15

peiition under section 482 o'f cr.P.c., praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may} i" prlri"a to^quash all^{further proceedingsin Crime No. 217 of 20'19 of Central} Crime Station, Hyderabad

¶16

l.A. NO: 2OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may} ne pterseo to stay all^{further proceedings including the arrestof the petitionersin} crime No. 217 of^{2O1gof central crim6station,l-lyderabad, pending disposalof} the above Criminal^Petition.

¶18

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of criminal^{Petitionand upon hearing the arguments of sri T S} ANIRUDH REDDY, Advocate^{for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the} StateofTelanganaonbehalfoftheRespondentNo.2andofSriT.NATRAJ' Advocate for the ResPondent^No.'1 '

¶19

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶20

i:.: -;-, '+r-- '' '-⁷

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7168 OF 2019

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that t1te cause in criminzrl pet-ition does not survive for adjudication and has become infiur: ,uous.

¶26

Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismisse d ar; infructuous.

¶27

Miscellarreous Petitions, pending if an5r, sha 11 stand closed.

¶28

Sd/- P,CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

¶31

\ sEc'rloN oFFIcER

¶32

'l . The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, llyderabad. 2. The Station Hor-se Officer, Cehtral Crime-Station, HyderaUa'ci. ' 3. Two CCs to the Public^prosecutor, High Court tol th6 State of^--elangana at Hyderabad (OU I)

¶33