Petition sought quashing of defamation proceedings in C.C.No.410 of 2014 under Sections 499 and 500 IPC before the Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Special Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamareddy. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive; the High Court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6082 OF 2019
Between:
M,Rajanna, S/o Rajanna, aged 59years, Occ:CivilContractor, PR, R and B, lB, Rlo H.No. 2-23,'sikindrapoor village, JakranpallyMandal,Nizamabad
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
Permanent Rio H.No. 1-6-1711, Srir{nnagar,PostECIL, Hyderabad-62. 1 ...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased toquash the Proceedingsin C.C,No.41Oof 2014, on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge-Special JudicialFirst Class Magistrate (Mobile)at Kamareddy, for the offences under Section499 and 500 lPC.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C.,praying thatin thecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furtherproceedingsin C.C.No.41O of 2014, on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge -Special JudicialFirst ClassMagistrate (Mobile) at Kamareddy.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing theMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearing the argumentsof Sri V.RAVI KIRAN RAO, Advocate for the Petitionerand the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri GADDAM SRINIVAS, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
i
THE H()NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER -
Crl.P.No.6O82 OF 2OL9 ,.
ORDER:
1 . Mr.V. Rohit, learne d counsel representing learned counsel on record submits that the cause in criminal petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous.
closed.
I
Sd/- L. LAKSHMI BABU ASS s ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
To,
SECTION OFFICER
'1 The court of Additionar Junior civir Judge -speciar Judiciar First Class Magistrate (Mobile) at famareOiy.-'
I
HIGH GOURT
DATED:0510212025
ORDER
CRLP.No.6082 of 2019
}..
tnE Sr4
'(
3 2 4 fiAn 2025 !
c
a
a
,4r e
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS IN FRUCTUOUS
@
?5
b
1 issue framed by the court
Should proceedings in C.C.No.410 of 2014 for offences under Sections 499 and 500 IPC be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Rajanna
State of Telangana
Smt. Anitha Sangnath
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
