Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in a private complaint case alleging extortion and criminal intimidation. Counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6057 0F 2025
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS
AND
,..RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 437143814391482 of Cr.P.C/ 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/A'l to ,A3 in CC No. 4522 OF 2022 on the files of the learned Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal Malkajgiri at L.B Nagar, wherein the petitioners are arrayed as Accused No.'1 to 3 for allegedly having committed an offence punishable under Sections 384,447,506, r/w 34 and 156 (3) of IPC 1908.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praylng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Gtuunds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay for all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioners/A1 to 43 in CC No. 4522 OF 2022 on the files of the learned Vl Addl. lvletropolitan Magistrate, Medchal Malkajgiri at L.B Nagar wherein the petitioners
are arrayed as Accused No.1 to 3 for allegedly having cc rrmitted an offence punishable under Section 384, 447 ,506, r/w 34 and 156 (3) r f IPC 1908.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing re [\ilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing rre arguments of MTs.MALLAREDDYGARI HARTHIKA,Advocate for the Pe ttioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telanganir on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 Advocate for the Respondent No.2 None ,\ )peared
The C6urt made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K.SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6O 57 of 2O25
ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal petition with liberty to file a fresh pet it ion.
2 Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
liberty to lile a fresh petition in case the cause survives
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR
ASS TANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
EPR/PSL
*)
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410812025
ORDER
CRLP.No.6057of 2025
/.,
l.
,'.,'
ri
' '. ::tlt L<br>$r; ,:-t lilj
;;j
.:. il
\ -. {', ->, ,// /1
. . .',,..?
'i.' '>.
THE CRIMINALPETITION IS DISMISSIID
q
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muneeruddin
Mohd. Akhil
Mohd. Mustafa
The State of Telangana
Syed Mujahid Hussain
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
