Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of a crime registered for offences under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 120B IPC was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132511
tN THEHIGH COURTFORTHESTATEOF TELANGANA
MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL '"-''lno inousAND AND TWENw FlvE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTIGE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITIONl'lO:5992 oF 2021
Between:
..'Petitioner/AccusedNo' 1 to 3
AND
...ResPondents/ComPlainants
Petitionunder Section482 of Cr'P'C prgyins-.lhat in the circumstances stated inthe Memorandu*# #;;'tIi ciirni'ntrptiition'the Hish court mav be Nf"'+sS of.?fl21daled'22fr712o21on lhe oleased tocall for tn" '""oiiin"6t"*t iite of S.H.o.,P S SanathnJjat" dviii''u"ooistrict for an offences U/ sec'406' 42o, so6,12oBlpc and q;v$'i#;il;;. aur"" otprocess of law asainst the petitioners herein
t.A. NO t2oF 2021
Petition underSection482 of cr.P.Cpraylng- Jhatin the circumstances statedin the Memorandu* oi C;"o-rJ.oi Cri.ni'naf p"tition, the High C,ourt may be pr.t*tOinli inctu^tngarrestof the petitionersin oleasedto grant stay of all ''ni"t connectionwith crime Nr".isi';t-i62;-;;ttd22-o7-ii21 on the file of s H o '
P.S.Sanathnagar, Cyberabad .Diskicl for an offences U/ Sec.406, 420, 506, 12OB IPC, pending disposat of the above Criminai p.tftit. "
t.A. NO:3 oF 2021
Petition under Section _4g2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds "rcr,-il"i'p"iition,the High court may be pleased to extend the interim oro"r. at, g0/#olr' i".."0 in crrp No.s992/2021 until further orders, pending disposar "iin" ,i.r" ii'p in this Hon,bre court.
^ Thispetition coming- on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon frearing the arguments of sri K Sai Babu, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri M.vivekananda Reddy, Assistant Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respond"n, *o.t and none appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
I !
. :/'
I ,/
THEHONOURABLE SRr JUSTICEK'SURENDER/ CRTMTNALPETITION No.5992 OF 202L/
ORDER:
Learnedcounselfor the petitionerswould submit that thecauseinthecriminalpetitionnolongersuryivesfor adjudicationand has becomeinfructuous'
dismissedas infructuous'
MiscellaneousPetitions pending' if any' shallstand
closed.'
SD/- L. LAKSHMIBABU DEPUTYREGISTRAR
Gl
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. The XlMetropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally at Prashanthnagar, Cyberabad
2.TheStationHouseOn'cer,Sa-nathnagarPolice-station'Cyberabad 3. Two CCsto the Publicpr.oJ*utor.'iignCourtfor the State of Telanganaat Hyderabad(OUT) 4. d; cc toiri K Sai Babu, Advocate [oPUCl
)ffi,
ABK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 28t04t2025
ORDER
CRLP.No.5992 of 2021
lHE S l/1
,l o
+ a<br>J
:)
't- 0 3 stP 2025
*
DISMISS]NG THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
q 0
5 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s Thomson and others (Petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 to 3)
The State of Telangana
Respondent No.2/Complainant
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
