Disposed

B.Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Apr 2025CRLRC/307/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision against the Magistrate's refusal to return the petitioner's seized Maruti Suzuki Dezire car in a pending criminal case. The High Court directed interim release subject to personal bond of Rs.2,00,000 with surety, deposit of registration certificate, and undertakings to produce the vehicle and not alienate it.

What did the court decide?

Vehicle ordered released to petitioner on bond of Rs.2,00,000 with one surety; original RC deposited; certified copy for plying; undertakings to produce and not alienate the vehicle.

B.Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH-COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE^{TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶6

CRIMINAL^{REVISIONCASE NO:307 0F 2025}

¶7

Criminal Revision^{Casefiled under Section^438& 442of BNSSqg-ai1sl-11'e} Judoment dated^{1o/01/20zHi',Iii1ii"'ca.rrl-.F.r'lo.oo. ot 2025 ln Cr'No '!{l of.2024} # tffit; ;i t"# b;;,r;i^{d"'p;,l-"iprtJunior civirJudse-cum-JudicialMagistrate} of First Class,^{Suryapet,Thungathurty'}

¶8

Between:

¶9

oa. Aoed Maior,^{Occ. Coolie,Rl/o'K R K Thanda'Gundepuri} B.Srikanth,^{Sio. Lin} Village Thirumalgiri Manait, SurybPet^District.

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of^{Telangana,Rep by its Public Prosecutor' HighCourtof Telangana} at Hyderabad

¶13

...Respondent

¶14

IA NO: 10F²⁰²⁵

¶15

Petition under^{section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{affidavitt,,"J'in-twportof the petition, the HighCo.u.l.T1y^be} oleased to direct^{interimretease o?'vehicleCar Maruti Suzuki Dezire VDI BS Car} r.lo.isol-rn-s'178^{to Petitioner in the interestof justice'} il;;il

¶16

Gounsel for^{the Petitioner:SRl SHAFATHAHMED KHAN}

¶17

Counsel for^{the Respondent: ASSISTANTPUBLIC PROSECUTOR}

¶18

The Court delivered^{the following: Judgment}

I I

I ,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMTNAL REVTSION CASE No.3O7 OF 20:25 JUDGMENT:

¶23

This Cr-rrr:inal Revision Case is filed , b1, Ll e petitioner aggrieved b'y tet, docket order dated 10.01.2025 in CrLM.P.No.06 of 2025 in^rllr. \lo 117 of 2024, on the file of Principal J:nior Civil Judge-Cum Jr.rdir:ia1 Magistrate of First Class Suryapet, Thungathurtl

¶24

Heard lear'rred counsel for the revision petitione r and the learned Ass.stant Public Prosecutor for respondent- Sit at.t.

¶25

The learnec Magistrate refused to return the ntor_or vehicle of the petitior,c;' ',r.hich is a Maruti Suzuki D ezir,= ci Lr bearing No.TSOS-FA-5 7'8,.

¶26

Learnr:d co,utsel for the petitioner undertake,; _o furnish security for interi"n custody and prays for release of^.tLLe rrehicle.

¶27

Learne:d ,,.ssistant Public prosecutor opposed fr rr iuterim custody of tl-re lr hicle.

¶28

Consiiler: , g the submission of the learned cc,t nl,rel for the petitioner, the v'clLicle shall be returned to the petitioner on proper verification of o,rnership as an interim custody subjr:ct to the condition of th. petitioner furnishing persona_I bond ibr a sum of

¶29

¶30

Rs.2,00,000/-^{(Rupees Two lakhs only)with one surety for a like} sum to^{the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate' He shall} deposit^{the original registration certificate in respect of the vehicle} with the said^{Court' However,the designated Court shallissue} its certified^{copy to the petitioner to enable him to ply the vehicle} on road without^{there being any hindrance; and he shall give an} undertaking^{to the effect that he sha1l produce the vehicle as and} when required^{eitherbefore the InvestigatingOffrcer or beforethe} Court and^{that he shaLl not alienate'alter or chalge the nature of} the vehicle

¶31

disposed^of 7. Accord,ingly,^{Criminal Revision Case ls} Miscellaneous^{applications pending'if any' shall stand closed'}

¶32

SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL D PUTY^REGISTRAR

/ffRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal^{Junior CivilJudge-Cum-JudicialMagistrateof First Class'} SuryaPet, ThungathurtY

¶37

z o",idCit^{sRl SHAFATH AHMED KHAN' Advocate[oPUc]}

¶38

Two CCs^{to the punflc piosecutolHighCourt for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad^(OUT)

¶39

Two CD^CoPies

ADK/gh

U,,LP

I I I I

' i I II I ! I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:25104t2025

JUDGMENT'

CRLRC.No.307 ot 2025

lll(-'
.('r,
()C 21 illY 2025
.I
+,* * .d'
t)i. S F'l- r rf.o

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE CRLRC

¶51

oilfistt

B.Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Srikanth v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri UdariMallesh Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Bucha Saroja Vs The State of Telanana and another

Singaram Akhil Vs State of Telangana

Munagala Mahesh Vs The State of Telangana

G. Sridhar Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Ramesh , Nagesh and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and Another