Disposed

Vemula Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Apr 2025CRLP/5445/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner/accused sought extension of time to appear before the SHO, Petbasheerabad Police Station and receive a Section 35(3) BNSS notice, having been detained in another case. The court extended time, directing appearance by 07.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Time extended; petitioner directed to appear before SHO, Petbasheerabad Police Station by 07.09.2025; rest of order dated 22.04.2025 holds good.

Vemula Kumari Vs The State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

132171

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR-THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

[/ONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SR}JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶6

l.A.No.3 ot 2025

¶7

tn CRIMINA LP ETITION NO: 5445 oF 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

Vemula Kumari, W/o. Vem s#;:xar$.ri:?:'1,":Hiif^Ssshf ',$,,iJ"TE;"?*,:ffi 'u:;ff :a';

¶10

AND

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1

¶12

1 Iii,rtJli:fi.*lansana'^{Rep' bv Public Prosecutor Hish court of reransana}

¶13

2 skf?ifiirsi#H:;riffi iuli:nI";:ffi ;iil::::l,

¶14

...RESPONDE NT/COM PLAI NANT

¶15

Petition under Section 52g of BNSS praying that int the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds "r^{cr_ii,rr,p"iiti""'tt} "^{frinntllli,".lXlii"} pleased to extend the time granted to the petitionei_ to appear before the sHo, Petbasherabad porice statioi, oy a rur*rer^-per]".' or t"n 10 days or such other

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K R SUNIL KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Jithen der Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No. '1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

¶18

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶19

Thisapplicationhasbeenfiledpetitioner/accusedNo.lseekingextensionof tir" to api"ltiefore^{tfre Station House Officer' Petbasheerabad Police Station'}

¶20

Heard^{Ms. MounikaK, learnedcounsel, representing Mr.K.R.SunilKumar,} learned counsel^{for the petitioner'}

¶21

As^per the^{petitioner's counsel,} $ough^{this Court has passedan orderin} Crl.P.No.5445^{of 2025 o" zi.oi.iinzs'Oilectingthe petitioner to appear before the} SHo concerne^{d on zg.oq.iois u"o t" receive-Section 35(3) of the BNSSnotice'in} the mean^{time, as anotneiirimewas registered,the petitionerwas taken into} laier, the^{petitioner fited crlmiiatpetition seekingpre-arrest. bail vide} "r.toay Crl.P.No. "nO^{9293of 2025, in in" inst"nt crime The Court' having regardto.theearlier} oiiui,^{go"t"d liberty to file appropriate application seeking extension of time.Thus,} in"-prEt""t^{petitionis riteJ'leetlng extension of time to complythe order in} Crl.P.No.5445^{of 2025.}

¶22

I have^{perused the materials on record'}

¶23

Having regard^{to the submission and to extendone opportunity'extending} time to comf,ly^{tie order iuiiizzoqzo25is found appropriateAccordingly',the} p"iiti".*lr"ir.ed No.1^{is Jirecteato appear before the SHO' Petbasheerabad} Policestation,inconnectionwithcrimetto.+g+of2025,by0709'2025'Restofthe orO"iir, CA.p.U^{o. 5445ot 2O25daled 22 O4 2025' holdsgood'}

¶24

Accordingly,^{this applicationis ordered}

¶25

//TRUE COPY//

¶26

' SD/- MOHD.^ISMAIL Ury REGISTRAR \ Ecrtou oFFlcER

¶27

To,

¶28

l.ThelXAdditionalJudicialFirstClassMagistrate,CyberabadMedchal Z. fh" .trtrn^{HouseOfficer, Petbasheerbad Police Station' Cyberabad} 5. f*" CCr^{to the public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad^(OUT)

¶29

+. one cc to^{sRl K R SUNIL KUMAR, Advocate[oPUC]}

¶30

Two CD^CoPies

0 AD

HIGH^COURT

DATED:01^10912025

ORDER

l.A.No.3^{of 2025} tn CRLP.No.5445^{of 2025}

¶36

.( S1.,'\fE
()tJ lffi 6)
I i, iJ \ 19-P

.J.t
{
a)!: 5F-Iil
|--n-.)i

¶37

¶38

EXTENSION

¶39

CI1 q
l,r

Vemula Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vemula Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govindreddy Bhasker Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Kanneveni Mallaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Rayala Avinash Vs The State of Telangana

Bureddy Lokanath Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

B. Venkata Ramana Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Naseeruddin Khan Vs The State of Telangana