Accused sought quashing of a trial court order directing disputed documents and specimen signatures to be sent to FSL for comparison. Petitioners were not suspected persons; the court held no prejudice would be caused. Criminal petition dismissed and pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{
[33851
IN '' THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITIONNO:4568OF 2025
Between:
All are Rl/oEedugattepalli Village, lvlanakondurMandal' Karimnagar District
...PetitionersI A1 to A3
AND
...ResPondents/ ComPlainants
Petition undersection528 of BNsS praying that in the circumstances stated inthe Memorandumof Groundsof Crimrnal Petition' the High Courtmay bepleased to quashthe order dated13 09 2024 passedin Crl M'P'No'598of 2024inCrime.No6lof2024bySpecialJudicialMagistrateofF.C.(Excise)at Karimnagar
r.A. NO:10F 2025
Petition undersection 482 of cr P C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theMemorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition'the HighCourtmay bepleased tosuspendthe order Dated 13 09 2024 passed in Crl'MP'No 598 of 2024 in Cr.No61 of 2024 by the Judicialmagistrateof F'C{ EXCISE) Karim nagar.
This Pertit,on coming on for hearing, upon perul;ing the lvtemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments 01 sri v. srikantha Rao, Advocatr: f cr the petitioners and the Assistant p rbric prcsecutor (TG/Ap) on behalf of the |tespondent No. 1.
The Court made the following Order:-
THE HOITOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.4568 of 2025
ORAL ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the docket order dated 13.09.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.598 of 2024 in Crime No.61 of 2O24 by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Excise), Karimnagar.
2
l I iI I I t I
docurrents. Aggrieved by this decision, the pre sent criminal p,:ti t;c,n has been filed.
4 Learned counsel for the petitioner sultmit ed that no
rlot rcc was issued to the pedtioners ltefor_e
s ending the d,)c u'nent to the FSL, and that the Court mul t hear the fn)tir:i[ rrr]rs before sending the documr:nts lo the FSL. 'I'hercltre, he prayed the Court to set aside the cloc <et ordcr of the lrlrl Court by allowing tJ:is criminal petition.
5 ()r the other hand, the learned Assrsr: nt public Pr1)s.c, I t,)r opposed the submissions macie br rl e learned corrnst:l I'rr the petitioners, stating that the petirio,t rs ilre rlot slrsl), cr(([ persons axd are in no way conne,]ted to t-le iillegecl .rrr.rr l'lterefore, notice to the petitioners \vas n.)t tecessarv for ;enr: ing the disputed documents to the FIIL a_rci p raved the CloLtrt r( lismiss the criminal petition.
l
3
I I a 1 ii a i i tI t !I I
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR I SECTION OFFICER
VC/PSL
II I I i I I !
HIGH COI'RT
DATED:03'10412025
ORDER
( ( ,rr 1.iE : r< I€
J (
l
,J
t 01 trrt X6
c)
* \
{
r€t
sj'l':l).-
CRLP.No.ai568 of 2025
DISMISSINII3 THE CRLP
616t'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's order sending disputed documents to FSL for signature comparison without notice to petitioners should be quashed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yadagiri Dasari
Ashok Dasari
Padma Dasari
The State of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor
Appani Thorupathi
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
