Dismissed

Chennarapu Sujatha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC14 Feb 2025CRLP/4238/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings against petitioners in a pending trial; counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition to file afresh, and the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to file a fresh one; petition dismissed as withdrawn and miscellaneous applications closed.

Chennarapu Sujatha Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

13257 |

¶2

l i .:

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABI.E SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:42380F 2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

Chennarapu S^ujatha, Wo. C. Ashok, Aged 53 years, Occ Housewife, Rio. H. No .4-106, Btrageeratha Colony, Road No. 7,' tvtahabuOnagai iown, lrlahbubnagar District.

¶10

1. Chennarapu Ashok, , S/o. Ch. Ramulu, Age 62 Years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No. 4-'106. Bhageeratha Colony, Road No. 7, Mahabubnagar Town, Mahbubnagar District.

¶11

!r.-

¶12

...Petitioner/Accused No.2 and 3

¶13

AND

¶14

1 The State of Telangana, Rep., by Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶15

... RespondenURespondent

¶16

2 Pallepati Nidhitha, Wo. C. Ranjith, Aged About 26 years, Occ Software Employe_e, R/o Flat No, 402, BKtr/ Ap-artment, Besirle Sathysai Mandir, Gadwal-509 125.

¶17

...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant

¶18

Petition under section 482 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Jt/emorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/ accuse-d No. 2 and 3 in c.c. No. 528 of 2023 on the fite of the Learned 'lst Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Gadwal

¶19

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p-c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/ accused No. 2 and 3 in c.c. No. 528 of 2023 on the file of the Learned 1st Additional Judicial First Class Magrstrate, at Gadwal

¶21

_-.

¶22

i:.*-

¶23

This Petitron ccming^{on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{[retition and upon hearing the argumentsof sri T BALA} lvoHAN REDDY. Advocate^{for the Petitioner and the Addl.Public rrosecutoron} behalf of the Respondent^{No.1 and of Sri Bala N/urali, Advocatefor the} Respondent No.²

¶24

The Court made the^{fc,llowing:ORDER}

¶25

.a {'

¶26

:'-.-

¶27

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JU\ryADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.4238 of 2024

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to

¶30

withdraw the Criminal Petition with a liberty to file fresh

¶31

Criminal Petition.

¶32

Permission is accorded.

¶33

¶34

Accordingly, this Crirninal Pctition is dismissed as

¶35

withdrawn, granting liberty as sought for.

¶36

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶37

closed.

¶38

Sd/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSIST NT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To,

S CTION OFFICER

1 . The 1"t Additional Judicial First Class lvlagistrate at Gadwal. 2. The station House officer, Gadwar rN p6tice stairon, Joguramba Dist. 3. One CC to SRt T BALA MOHAN REDDY Advocaie fOCJai^{-- - -'} 4. Two CCs to the^pubric prosecutor, High court for thd staie 6r rehngana at Hyderabad [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies

*nY,

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1410212025

ORDER

CRLP.No.4238 of 2024

:._::---
7.
(
'.i-
,j 0 4 APi 2[?I
),..,"
i)
i( '
=)-?

¶51

DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE CRIMINAI- PETITION

¶52

p
w llr

Chennarapu Sujatha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chennarapu Sujatha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bollam Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana

Bharathamma Bhandharam Vs The State of Telangana

Guvvala Pavan Kumar @ Billa Pavan Vs State of Telangana

Chennarapu Ranjith Vs The State of Telangana

Tajunnisa Vs The State of Telangana

Allukapally Dharma Raj Vs The State of Telangana