Jillellamudi Venkata Muralidhar v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
DVC quashal via S.528 BNSS Criminal Petition held NOT maintainable; appeal remedy under PWDV Act 2005 (Section 2g as printed) against Court below's cognizance/numbering act; Gaddameedi Nagamani v. State of Telangana relied on; appearance of respondents Nos.1-4 in DVC No.33 of 2024 dispensed with save trial-Court-required dates, counsel representation mandatory each hearing else auto-vacation; Medchal-Malkajgiri District at L.B. Nagar; petition disposed 17-02-2025; judge Juwadi Sridevi.
What did the court decide?
Quashal refused: petitioners directed to avail the appeal remedy afforded under the PWDV Act, 2005 instead; personal appearance of petitioners/respondents Nos.1 to 4 in D.V.C.No.33 of 2024 dispensed with (except when the trial Court requires their presence), conditional upon representation by counsel on every hearing date, failing which the dispensation auto-vacates; pending miscellaneous applications closed.