The High Court dismissed a criminal petition for anticipatory bail filed by an accused charged with offences of assault and property damage. The Court held that the specific allegations and the petitioner's previous criminal history precluded the grant of bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16479 OF 2025
Between:
Chinta Ravindhar Reddy @ Chintha Ravinder Reddy,, S/o.Chintha Narsa Reddy, Aged 49 Years, R/o.H.No.1-41, Brahmanapalle, Mandal Toopran, District Medak.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.351 of 2025. of S.H.O., P.S. Toopran, District Medak
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GUNDARAM MANOJ GOUD, Advocate for the Petitioner and D. ARUN KUMAR Additional Public Pros6cutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT F-,c)R THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJAI{A
CRIMINAL PETITION No.16479 OF 2()25
29.12.2025
Between:
Chinta Ravindhar Reddv
Petitioner/A. 1
And
The State of Telangana, Rep , by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana & another
... Respondent
: ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the petitioner/ A. 1 seeking anticipatory _bail in connection with Crime No.351 of 2025 of Toopran Police Station, Medak District. Thc olfences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 32q(3), 118( l), 118(2), 115(2), 352 r/w.3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSJ.
2
3
Basing on the said complaint,police registeredthe case against the accused for the above offences.
r-
4
I
7 Accordingly,this criminal petition is dismissed'
Miscellaneousapplications,ifanypending,shallstand
closed. SD/- --' AsstsreNr S.MALLIKARJUNA REGISTRARRAO
(9
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
\ \rnoCCs\o Pub\tcPtosecu\ot Hyderabad [oUTl
5.Two CD CoPles
,b
HIGH COURT
I)ATED: 2911212025
ORDER CRLP.No.16479 ot 2025
iitc S trtl ': ::....
t
.:\ ".
t-\
1 B rIB 2026
tl
,.1.
pA
DISM,SS,NG THE CRIMINAL PETIT,ON
1
r? ?'.b
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite specific allegations and prior criminal history of the accused.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chinta Ravindhar Reddy
The State of Telangana
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
