Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kondapally Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2025
Kondapally Ramulu Vs The State of TelanganaKondapally Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Dismissed¶44

Kondapally Ramulu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Dec 2025CRLP/16243/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana HC; Criminal Petition No.16243 of 2025; J Sreenivas Rao J; 09.12.2025; dismissed as withdrawn; quashing/stay petition ss. 582 & 528 BNSS re FIR (printed 'No.l355') of 2025 dt. 21.11.2025 Raidurgam PS Cyberabad; earlier identical petition Crl.P.No.15556 of 2025 disposed 26.11.2025 with s.41-A CrPC / s.35(3) BNSS and Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guideline directions; concealment of earlier petition alleged as abuse of process (APP submission); petitioner Kondapally Ramulu (accused); respondent 2/de facto complainant Smt Kondapally Magamma; advocate Vijay Bhaskar Kakunoor B (petitioner); APP Jithender Rao Veeramalla (State).

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition (seeking quashing of, and stay of proceedings in, the Raidurgam PS FIR of 2025 dated 21.11.2025) was dismissed as withdrawn with the Court's permission; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.

Why is it important?

Permission was accorded to the petitioner (whose counsel sought leave) to withdraw the present Criminal Petition. ¶42

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

The Criminal Petition (seeking quashing of, and stay of proceedings in, the Raidurgam PS FIR of 2025 dated 21.11.2025) was dismissed as withdrawn with the Court's permission; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.

Ratio / Principle

Permission was accorded to the petitioner (whose counsel sought leave) to withdraw the present Criminal Petition.

Key takeaways

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition was dismissed as withdrawn.ratio¶44
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶45

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Criminal Petition – Withdrawal on disclosure of duplicate earlier petition. Kondapally Ramulu (accused) filed Criminal Petition No.16243 of 2025 in the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Justice J Sreenivas Rao, 09.12.2025) under Sections 582 and 528 B.N.S.S. seeking to quash and to stay proceedings in FIR (number printed as 'No.l355') of 2025 dated 21.11.2025 of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad. On hearing, the Additional Public Prosecutor informed the Court that the selfsame petitioner had earlier sought the same relief through Crl.P.No.15556 of 2025, which was disposed of on 26.11.2025 with directions to the Investigating Officer to follow Section 41-A CrPC / Section 35(3) BNSS and the Apex Court guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, and that concealing that earlier petition made the present petition a clear abuse of the process of law. Counsel for the petitioner then sought permission to withdraw the petition; the Court accorded permission, dismissed the Criminal Petition as withdrawn, and ordered pending miscellaneous applications, if any, to stand closed.

A

[³³⁰³ ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16243 OF 2025

Between:

Kondapally Ramulu, S/o Late Ramakrishna, Aged about: 32^years, Occ: Social worker, Fl/o 2-74lA Kothaguda, Kothaguda, Kandukar, Ranga Reddy, Telangana.

...Petitioner/Accused

AND

'l . The State of Telangana,, through Public Prosecutor, High Court of TS rep Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad

Smt Kondapally Magamma, w/o K.Shekar Rl/o H.No. 2-4812114114, Telcomnagar, Gachibowli, Sedingampally, Ranga Reddy District

...Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant

Petition under Section 582 of B.N.S.S.^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records and^quash FIR Nol355 of 2A25 daled^2111112025 on the file of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025

Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^Petition, the^{High Court may} be pleased to stay all further^proceedings in FIR Nol355 of 2025^{on dated} 2111112025 on the file of Raidurgam-Police-Station, Cyberabad.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^{Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri^Vijay Bhaskar Kakunoor B ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender^Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of^'the Sole^Respondent.

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

I I

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OFl''LANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SR-EEI,I VAS RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16243 of 2125

Date:09.12.2025

Between:

Kondapally Ramulu

..Petitioner

AND

The State of'Telangana, through Public Prosecutor, High Court of TS rep. Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad and another

Respondents

ORDER

When this matter is taken up for consideration,

Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, leamed Arltl lional public

Prosecutor fbr respondent No.l-State, submitted thir the very same petitioner had earlier approached this Court by. 1 ling Criminat Petition vide Crl.P.No.15556 of 2025 seeking to cr ash the crime, and this Court disposed of the said Crimina petition on 26.11.2025, directing the Investigating Officer o follow the procedure under Section 41-A of the Cr.p.C. / Secri rn 35(3) of the BNSS, as rvell as the guidelines formulated by th: Hon,ble Apex

2

Court in Arnesh Kamar^{Vs. State of Biharr.The petitioner}

suppressed the^{fact ofhaving the earlier criminal petition and filed} the present petition,^{which is a clear abuseof the processof law'}

[n view of the above^{submissions, learned counsel for the}

petitioner seeks permission of^{this Court to withdraw the present}

Criminal Petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Criminal^{Petition isdismissedas}

withdrawn.

Pending miscellaneous^{applications, ifany, shall stand}

closed.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/. P. PONNA^KRISHNA SISTANT REGIST

SECTION OFFICER

I

I

To, 1. The Xlll Additional^{Judicial Magistrate of First Class' R'R' District at} Rajendranagar.

ThL Station-House^{Officer, Raidurgam Police Station' Cyberabad'}

r*o ccs to^{the public prosecutor,Higrrcourt for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad.(OUT)

o;; cC to^{bri Vijay Bhaskar KakunoorB, Advocate[OPUC]}

Two CD CoPies

\ K'.l TTS/Sa

\ 6torr<sup>isce a??

lr

HIGH COURT

DATED:0911212025

ORDER

GRLP.No.16243 of 2025

'iHE STA
(,-i
.)':
(-l(-') I JAN 2028
lo^ ..-

a

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WI HDRAWN J-< s afrlza

Cases cited

Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority

AI extract

Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharReferred¶37
Arnesh Kamar Vs. State of Biharr.

Statutes considered

4 provisions across 2 enactments

AI extract

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)582¶14 528¶16 35(3)¶35
CrPC41-A¶35

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
FIR bearing the number printed (with OCR distortion) as 'No.l355' of 2025, dated 21.11.2025, on the file of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad — the FIR the Criminal Petition sought to quash and in which stay of further proceedings was sought.¶14
Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad · 21.11.2025
Prior proceeding
The very same petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing Criminal Petition vide Crl.P.No.15556 of 2025 seeking to quash the crime; that petition was disposed of by this Court on 26.11.2025.¶35
Prior proceeding
In the earlier disposal, the Investigating Officer was directed to follow the procedure under Section 41-A CrPC / Section 35(3) BNSS as well as the Apex Court guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar.¶35
Prior proceeding
At this hearing, the Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submitted that the petitioner had suppressed the fact of having filed the earlier criminal petition and had filed the present petition, which he termed a clear abuse of the process of law.¶38

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Kondapally Ramulu¶8
Vijay Bhaskar Kakunoor B
respondent
The State of Telangana (through Public Prosecutor, High Court of TS, rep. Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad)¶11
Jithender Rao Veeramalla
respondent
Smt Kondapally Magamma¶12

Coram

AI extract

J Sreenivas Raoauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 9 Dec 2025 · December
Registered: 6 Dec 2025
Case no.: CRLP/16243/2025
CNR: HBHC010740902025
Bench: J Sreenivas Rao
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Case type: Criminal Petition

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from J Sreenivas Rao

Sri Markunta Ravikanth, Vs The State of Telangana
8 Dec 2025
Shaheda Parveen, Vs The State of Telangana
8 Dec 2025
Azhar Ali Khan Vs State of Telangana
8 Dec 2025
Smt Vijaymala Vs Smt. Vanitha Pawar
9 Dec 2025
Amit Sharma, Vs The State of Telangana
9 Dec 2025
Smt. Rukmini Singh alias Rukmini Bai Vs The State of Telangana
9 Dec 2025

Cite this judgement

Kondapally Ramulu v. The State of Telangana, CRLP/16243/2025 (TEL), decided on 9 December 2025.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Cases cited1

Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharReferred¶37

Open Authorities

Statutes4

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)582 · 528 · 35(3)
CrPC41-A

View all statutes

Procedural history4

FIR bearing the number printed (with OCR distortion) as 'No.l355' of 2025, dated 21.11.2025, on the file of Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad — the FIR the Criminal Petition sought to quash and in which stay of further proceedings was sought.Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad · 21.11.2025
The very same petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing Criminal Petition vide Crl.P.No.15556 of 2025 seeking to quash the crime; that petition was disposed of by this Court on 26.11.2025.
In the earlier disposal, the Investigating Officer was directed to follow the procedure under Section 41-A CrPC / Section 35(3) BNSS as well as the Apex Court guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar.

View full history

Bench / Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Parties & counsel