Dismissed¶24

K.Bala Krishna Rao and 2 Others v. Smt M.Sudha Rani and Another

Telangana HC3 Feb 2025CRLP/14881/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, single judge (K. Sujana, J.), order dated 03-02-2025 in Criminal Petition No. 14881 of 2014: Section 482 Cr.P.C. quash petition directed against D.V.C. No. 138 of 2014 (III Metropolitan Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad) dismissed for non-prosecution owing to repeated non-representation by the petitioners; related interim stay application I.A. No. 2 of 2014 (Crl.P.M.P. No. 15767 of 2014) forms part of the same matter; no ruling on merits, no case law cited, no monetary quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

In view of the absence of representation for the petitioners on several earlier occasions and on the date of hearing, the Court presumed that the petitioners were not interested in proceeding with the criminal petition. ¶23

K.Bala Krishna Rao and 2 Others Vs Smt M.Sudha Rani and Another — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY^{OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT^{JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶5

CRIMINAL PE^{TITIONNO: 14881 OF 2014}

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 K.BALA KRISHNA RAO, S/o.^{Late Bapu Rao, Aged about 70 years,Occ} Retd. Employee, R/o. 240-C,^{LIGH Ground Floor, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad'}

¶8

2 Smt.Rajya laxmi, W/o. Bala^{KrishnaRao,-Aged} about 65^years,Occ Housewife, Fl/o. 240-C, LIGH^{Ground Floor,S.R.Nag} ar, Hyderabad.

¶9

3 K.Anand Rao, S/o. Bala^{Krishna Rao, Aged about45 years,.Occ Govt'} Employee, Rl/o. 240-C, LIGH^{Ground Floor, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad.}

¶10

.....PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

1 SMT lvi.SUDHA RANI W/o.K.^{Ashok Kumar,Aged about 33 years, Occ} Housewife, R/o.^{H.No.1 5-5-61 5/2, Ashok Bazar,Afzalgunj,Hyderabad.}

¶13

2 The State of Telangana,, Rep.^{by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad} for the State of Tellngana anO the State^{of AndhraPradesh.}

¶14

.....RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P .C praying that in lhe circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to^quash the^{proceedingsin D.V.C.No.138 of 2014 on the file of lll} Metropolitan Magistrate, at Erramanzii,^Hyderabad.

¶16

l.A. NO:2OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO:^{15767OF 20 141}

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may} be pleased to stay all further^{proceedings includingthe pr.esenceof the} petitioners herein in DVC.No.13B/2014 on the file of the^{lllMetropolitan} Magistrate at Erramanzil, Hyderabad,^{pending disposal fo the aboveCrl.P}

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,^{upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds} of Criminal Petition and upon hearing^{the arguments of V.KRISHNA MURTHY,} Advocate for the Petitioners and the^{PublicProsecutoron behalf of the} Respondent No.2 and of None appeared^{for the Respondent No.1}

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.14881 of 2Ol4

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

In soitc of giving fair opportunities, there was no re pre sental ior-r for the petitioners on the t:arlier several occasions. Though the matter pertains to 2074, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners even today. It is presumed that rhe petitioners are not interested to proceed rvith the criminal petition.

¶24