Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of FIR No. 96 of 2015 registered at Basanthnagar police station. With no representation for the petitioner since July 2024, the High Court dismissed the criminal petition for non-prosecution and closed pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3385 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12616 OF 2015
Between:
Smt. tt/. Sarojini Devi, Wo M. Lachi Reddy, aged 49 years, housewife r/o Flat No. 128B MIGH, Vishnu Shashank Apartments SR Nagar, Hyderabad.
... Pctitioner/Accused No. 6
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash FIR No. 96 of 2015 dated 1'1 .8 2015 on the file of Basanthnagar P.S. Karimnagar Distrrct,.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 12591 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 96 of 2015 dated 11.8.2015 on the file of Basanthnagar P.S. Karimnagar District, including the arrest of the petitioner.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Karuna Sagbr, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.12616 of 2O15
ORAL ORDER:
Today, there is no representation on either side. It is seen that since O4.O7.2O24 no representation is made on behalf of the petitioner.
Miscellaneous appiications, if any pending, shall also stand
closed
//TRUE COPY'
Sd/. V. HARIPRASAD ,\T'^:'REGISTRAR/ U<sup>tt"t'oN oFFlcER
To,
a ol," cC i"Sri M KarunaSagar' AdvocateIOPUC]
DUgh
YY
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/02/2025
ORDER
CRLP.No.12616 of 2015
1t\ F- STA}
c,
4.
4.'
(i () 0I ir (, a,J
t UFsPn irl)1 -.4
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
g""soa Vv ffin"
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sarojini Devi
The State of Telangana
Bayyapu Vinay Kumar
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
