Talluri Alaric Sparjan v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Feb 2025CRLP/1455/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, CRLP No. 1455 of 2025, decided 04.02.2025 by Smt. Justice Juwadisridevi - dispensation/exemption from personal appearance of accused Nos. 1 to 4 (students) in C.C. No. 8126 of 2021, Jubilee Hills Police Station, offence under S.379 IPC, XVII ACMM Nampally; petition under S.528 BNSS; condition of representation by counsel on every hearing date; miscellaneous applications closed; no precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 4 before the trial Court dispensed with unless specifically required during the course of trial, subject to their representation by counsel on every date of hearing; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stood closed. ¶¶27

Talluri Alaric Sparjan Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH^{DAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICEJUWADISRIDEVI}

¶6

GRIMINAL PETITIO^{NNO :1455 0F 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Talluri Alaric Sparjan,^{S/oKrupasannidi,agedaboul} .22 -years'O.cc:Student' rlo ft ruo A-:-228r/88^{Near G'andhi Statut-e, Rahmath NagarYousufguda'} Hyderabad n/oi^{Bhimavaram,E.G.District, A.P-}

¶9

2 Udioa Sai Raiesh. S/o Ramarao,^{aged about 24 yea-sOcc:Student'r/o Plot} N; ilt;"Jl 15,'swaguna Kalian-Apartments,^{IVtothinagar' {alyan Nagar} pf,rs" ttt, Hyderabad, n7o Kaikaram, Tadepalligudem' A^P'

¶10

3 Kusuma Bhargav.^{S/o K Nageswara Rao, aged.aboul22 yeals'-O-cc,!Lu^{91} r/o H.No.^{'l0O:E, Madhuranagar' Yousfuguda,Hyderabad' n/o f<avulapalem'} East Godavari District,^A.P-

¶11

4 Garlaoati Hemanth Naidu,^{S/oSubramanyaSwamy, {ged about 2z^yearc'} occ:Student'r/oH'No.8-3-6TTl59l2lA,SaiKrishnaSadan,NavooayaU_olony, 6;;ilil Cilplex,^{Yousufguda, Hyderabad nio Palmaner, Chittoor' A.P}

¶12

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED^{NO.1 TO 4}

¶13

AND

¶14

'1-ThestateofTelangana,throughS.HO'JubileeHillsPoliceStation' HvJeiauao District]rep.^{by Pu6lic Prosecutor, High Court' Hyderabad'}

¶15

Chilla Sampath^{Rao, S/o Chilla Devadas Late Aged 72 years'9c9 netlr.e^{} - ar"[E.prbyee And oorng s;ciar work at Jesus-Christ Grace Ministry YSR .Jo"V, Ain^{j.guOa,nydeiabadr/o Jesus Christ Grace Ministry' YSR Colony} Almasguda, HYderabad.

¶16

.,.RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶17

PetitionunderSection528ofBNSS,prayingthatinthectrcumstances stated in the^{lr/lemorandumof Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High CoUrt may} be pleased to^{call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C'C No 8126 of} 2021 ,on the file^{of the XVll Additionalchieftvletropolitan It4agistrate at Nampally'} Hyderabad.

¶18

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under section 528 of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorzrndum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of aI further proceedings incruding the ;appearance of the petitioners in c.c.No 8126 of 2021 , on the fite of the XVll Additionat Chief tVletropolitan tVzrgistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶20

This Petition c,:ming on for hearing, upon perusing the A/emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri NARSING RAo MALLEPAGA, Advocate for the petitioners and the public pr,rsecutor (Tc) on behalf of the Respondent No.^'1 and None appeared for the Respondent No. 2

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

HON'BLE^{SMT. JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI} CRIMINA L^{PETITION No.1455 of2025}

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Petitioners,^{who are} arrayed as^{accused Nos'1 to 4'inr} ". C.C.No.8126^{of 2021 pendingon the file of learnedXVll AdditionalChief} Metropolitan^{tt/lagistrate at Nampally' Hyderabad' registered for the offence} under^{Section 379 of lPC, are seekingto quashthe proceedings against them'}

¶25

counsel^for Petitioners^and 2. Heard Sri^{M.Narsing Rao'learned} Additional^{Public Prosecutor} Sri Jithender^{Rao Veeramalla, learned} appearing^{for the respondent-State and perusedthe record}

¶26

Though the^{petition is filed for quashingthe proceedings' duringthe} course^{of arguments, learned counselfor the petitionershas restrictedhis} prayer to the^{extent ofdispensing with the presenceofthe} petitioners/accused^{Nos l to 4 before the trial Court'}

¶27

Hence, this^{petition is disposedof, dispensing with the appearance of} the^{petitioners/accusedNos' 1 to 4 before the trial Court' unless their} presence is^{specifically required during the course of trial' subject to the} conditionofpetitioners/accusedNos.lto4beingrepresentedbytheir counsel^{on every date of hearing'}

l!:c -:

.'l

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

Sd/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶35