Criminal petition to quash proceedings in S.C. No. 461 of 2022 involving alleged SC/ST Act and IPC offences was dismissed for non-prosecution, as neither counsel nor the petitioner appeared on the date of hearing or previously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THESECONDDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINALPETITION NO:13188oF 2024
Between:
Rao Aqed about29 Years,Occ Vanaoallv Akshay,S/o Shyam ,Suldar rriir" ainrColonY,NagoleUPPal ;;:il&1 niorl1rlo z-e-4el4/1co-oPe ilinaiitrrt"o"ttal-Malkajigiri District'
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
...RES'ONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petitionunder Section528 of BNSSprqylS that in the circumstances stated inthe Memorandr.Ii'Ol-ounOr of Ctirin"ip"lition, the High Courtmay be oteased tocall fortn","cori.-r.ia-tlnltopro_ceedingsin S.C. No- 461 of 2022 on ine tite ofthe special s"*i;;;:;;;e-tJrs-c.ani ST cum-vll-AddlDistrict and SessionsJudge,Ranga'"OivOitttiti At L B Nagar for the offenceUiSec 341' sEc 3(2) (Va)' 3 (1) (s) of SC/sr 50e, 504325 and +zz nt',"teliJ "trpc '"J (POA) AmendmentAct-201 5'
LA. NO: 1 oF 2024
PetitionunderSection52SofBNSSpra.ylsthatinthecircumstances stated inthe lr/temorandrrn'IiOl-oinO, ot Criminaipeiition, the High Courtmay be oleased tostav all tre turtn"erliii""Ji"gt in S C' No 461 of 2022'on the file of Jrds;' f;;";;lrE-srcum-Vll-Addl.Districtand sessions il:";:;i;3*i"". Judqe, Ranganeoay oistrllt;i L'B N';"for-theoffenceU/Sec 341'509' 504' -s1"a (2) (Va)' 3 (1) (s) of SC/ST (PoA) 325 and427 Rtw- secs+'Iiiii'"0 AmendmentAct-2015 inctuding personal upp"rrrn"" of the petitioner/Accused No.1 This Petitioncomang on for hearing, upon perusingthe lVlemorandumof GroundsofCriminalpetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSritvl RAMESHWARRAO,AdvocateforthePetitionerandthePublicProsecutoron behalf ofthe Respondent No 1 and none appeared for the RespondentNo-2'
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
I
; tt
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL pETrTroN No.t3t88 OF 2OZ4
JUDGMENT:
1 This Criminal petition is filecl to quash proceedings against the petitioner in S.C.No.46t of 2022 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SC & sr-cum-Vll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
a r) Accordingly, Criminal petition 1S dismissed flor non_
prosecution Consequently, miscellaneous applications, iI. anv. shall stald dismissecl
SD/- MOHD. |SMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
secr(J]fiorrrcen
To,
Tpk/gh
w
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:02104t2025
_: '.,.
12 AUE M f
.)2,
* uo
oA
ORDER
CRLP.N o.13188 of 2024
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
\I,C
o6 btr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akshay
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court
Respondent No.2 / Complainant (w/o Raman)
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
