Petitioner/A.4 sought anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging offences under Sections 137(2) and 64(2) r/w 49 BNS. Without going into merits, the Court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by 03.11.2025 and directed the IO to follow Section 35(3) BNSS and Arnesh Kumar guidelines. Petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.13128 OF 2025
ORDER :
This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner/A.4 seeking anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No.173 of 2025 of Kodad Rural Police Station, Suryapeta District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 137 (2), 64(2) r/w.49 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
down under Section 35 (3) of BNSS and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1 scrupulously. However, petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and documents as sought by him in concluding the investigation. The petitioner shall file all the documents, which he ought to file to prove that it does not come under the criminal offences and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the Magistrate.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
K. SUJANA, J
Date :15.10.2025 Rds
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13128 OF 2025
DATE :15.10.2025
Rds
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the A.4 seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.173/2025 under Sections 137(2), 64(2) r/w 49 BNS should be protected from arrest.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharApplied¶3
(2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
A.4 (petitioner)
State of Telangana
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
