Dismissed¶39

Agrahari Ankith v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Sept 2025CRLP/11122/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Criminal Petition No. 11122 of 2025 (decided 08-09-2025) by K. Sujana, J. Bail petition under Sections 480 & 483 BNSS-2023 by accused A.1 (grahari Ankith, S/o. Shiv Poojan) for release pending investigation, enquiry and trial in Crime No. 372 of 2025 of K.U.C Police Station, Warangal District. Counsel Dr Challa Srinivasa Reddy for petitioner; Sri Arun Kumar D, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. Petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause no longer survives. Keywords: bail, infructuous, dismissed, BNSS 2023 Sections 480 & 483, Telangana.

What did the court decide?

None; the bail prayer was not considered on merits and the petition was dismissed as infructuous, with pending miscellaneous applications, if any, standing closed. ¶39

Agrahari Ankith Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[^338s 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11122 oF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

fgrahari^{Ankith,S/o. Shiv Poojan, Aged 33years,Occ Matrix Business, R/o.} Beemaram, Hanumakonda, T.S,

¶9

...PETITIONER/A.1

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, at Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS-2023. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toto release the Petrtroner on Bail pending investigation, enquiry and trial in Crime No. 37212025 of K.U C Police Station, Warangal District, Telangana State, ln the interest o{ justice

¶14

This Petition coming on for hearing, upcin perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Dr Challa Srinrvasa Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar D, learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Sole Respondent.

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

THE HONOURABLE SMT.^{JUSTICEK. SUJA IA}

¶17

CRIMINAL PETITION No.l1122^of2o25

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

When thc matter is taken up^{for hearing,leanldcounsel} for the petitioner submitted^{that the cause in t:l:<;riminal} petition no longer survives for^{adjudicationand li ts become} infructuous.

¶20

2 Recording the said submission,^{this Crimine I Petitionis}

¶21

dismissed as^{i n} lructrtous

¶22

Miscell;rrrt,rrus applicarions, if^{any pendinp,sha1lalso}

¶23

sLand closed

¶24

{i Y- L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASIIi ;TANT REGISTRAR

¶25

,/TRUE COPY'/