State appeal against acquittal/conviction judgment of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad. The appellant failed to file proof of service of notice on respondents despite repeated adjournments since 2012; the High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 860 OF 2012
Appeal filed under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment dated 20.05.2010 passed in S.C.No. 518 of 2007 on the file of ttrc Court of the I Additional Sessions Judge Adilabad.
Between:
The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor HighCourt of AP., Hyderabad
...AppellanUPetitioner
AND
...RespondenUAccused
Counsel for the Appellant : Public Prosecutor
Counsel for Respondents : None appeared
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMTNAL APPEAL No.86O OF 2Ot2
JUDGMEI{T:
l. This Court on 24.08.2012 permitted the appellant to take out personal notice on the respondent and fite proof of service. Thereafter, the
case underwent several adjoumment.
that notice is sent pursuant to the orders passed by this Court.
dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, rhe appeal is dismissed.
dismissed.
Sd/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Njb/gh
\
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:061112025
JUDGMENT
CRLA.No.860 of 2012
9'. AI€ o
(
)
li(
2 i tis 2[25
O.)
.J
t ogg o,^,r
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL APPEAL
o
,]9-{_
<br>W
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP., Hyderabad
Balerao Madhav (A-1)
Balero Etabai (A-3)
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
