Criminal appeal against acquittal in a complaint case; the appeal and the limitation condonation petition were dismissed for non-prosecution, as counsel had died years earlier and no notice proof was filed despite directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
I I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
t.A.NO.1 0F 2015(CRL.A.M.P.NO.1488 0F 2015)
INIAND
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO:.221 OF 2025
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment dated 28.05.2015 passed in Crl.A.No 75 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the VlsAdditional Sessions Judge, at Godavarikhanipreferred against the Judgment dated 27-05-2014 made in C.C.No.42B of 2007 on the file of the Courtof the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Godavarikhani.
Between:
Gampa Narayana, S/o. Rajaiah, Aged about 63 Years, Occ Business, R/o. Jawahar Nagar of Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District
...AppellanURespondenUComplainant in CRLA and l.A.No.'1 of 2015
AND
...RespondenUAppellanUAccused in CRLA and l.A.No.1 of 2015
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLAMP. NO: 1488 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be
pleased to condone the deray of 74 days in firing the Appear against the order dated 28 05.2015 passed in Appeal No. 75t2014 on the file of the Vl Additionat Sessions Judge, Goclavarikhani, Karimangar District.
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 ; Sri Arun Kumar Dodla, Additional Public Prosecutor
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri Ajgal Ravi Babu
The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SURENDER
IN/AND
CRIMINAL APPEAL N0.221 0F 2025
COMMON JUDGMENT:
It is informed that the counsel appearing for the appellant died more than three years ago and the appellant has not made any a-lternate arrangements to prosecute the appeal.
Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
)v
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310112025
qpMMoN JUDGMENT
|.A.NO.1 OF 201s (CRL.A.M.p.NO.1488 OF 2015) IN/AND li l''E liaArl''E liaArE liaArliaAr €
li l''E liaArl''E liaArE liaArliaAr €
..:
.t
30 APB 2[25 fr
\i
^"sPalc,
CRLA.No.221 of 2025
DISMISSING THE CRLA AND l.A.No.1 of 2015 (t t- rt h )]
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sgam Dondiga a. Sts.te of Andhra prad.eshlReferred
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gampa Narayana
The State of Telangana
Pallerla Anjaneyulu
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
