Dismissed¶40

K.V. Janabai , Indira v. Smt Arundhati

Telangana HC30 Jan 2025CCCA/63/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

dismissal for default; non-prosecution; appellant gave no instructions; want of prosecution; Section 96 CPC appeal; CCCA.No.63 of 2007; O.S.No.15 of 2001; Judgment and Decree 09-10-2006; XIII Additional Chief Judge City Civil Court Hyderabad; High Court of Telangana; decided 30-01-2025; bench Abhinand Kumar Shavili and Tirumala Devi Eada; no costs; miscellaneous applications closed; Order 13 Rule 9 CPC return of original documents; hearing fixed 03-01-2025; civil appeal abandoned by plaintiff-appellant.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief granted: Appeal dismissed for default; 'No order as to costs'; as a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ¶40

K.V. Janabai , Indira Vs Smt Arundhati — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[^344s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

¶7

CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 63 OF 2007

¶8

Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 09/1 0/2006 made in O.S.No.1 5 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the Xlll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hdyerabad.

¶9

Between:

¶10

K.V. Janabai lndira, W/o Satyanarayana, Occ: Household, Rl/o 35-887, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶11

...AppellanUplai ntiff

¶12

AND

¶13

1 Smt Arundhati, Wo Ravi Kumar, Occ: Household, Rl/o 7-7-106, Kumar Galli, Nizamabad, Nizamabad Dsitrict.

¶14

2 Prakash Aganival, S/o not know , Occ: Business R/o 3-5-886/4/A, Hlmayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶15

J Fashion Dry Cleaners, Rep. its Proprietor P.S. Bakshi Business R/o 3-5-886/4/A, Hlmayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶16

4 National Resorter Development Co-operative. Society Ltd, Rep. by lncharge PVS Prasad S/o not known, Occ: Business, R/o 3-5-886/4/4, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶17

5 Shankar, S/o Ajay Kumar, Occ: Business, Fl/o 3-5-886/4/4, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶18

6 Harha Printers, Rep. by its Proprietor Smt Madhavilatha W/o Praveen, OcG:Business, R:/o 3-5-887, Hlmayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶19

...Respondents/Defendants

¶20

l.A. NO: I OF 201S(CCCAMP. NO: 14'l OF 2015)

¶21

Petition under Order 13 Rule 9 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to return the original documents Ex. 81 and 821 by replacing the same with the certified copies.

¶22

r"+-

¶23

Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. R Madhavi Latha

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri K Anoop Kumar

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : Sri CH Ramesh Babu Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2,3,5,6 : None appearerl The Court delivered the following: Judgment

w .../

t I

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE ABHINAilD KUMAR SHAVILI} AND

¶30

THE HON'BLE^{SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA}

¶31

c.c .C.A.No.63 OF^2OO7

¶32

JUDGMENTi fer^{the Hon'bteSri JusticeAbhinand KumarShauiLi)}

¶33

When the matter^{is taken up for hearing, learned}

¶34

counsel appearing^{for the appellanthas informedthe} Court that though^{learned counsel for the appellant} has informed her^{that the case is coming uP for} hcaring on^{03.O 1.20251} \h.^{has not given any} instructions to^{proceed with..thecase' Therefore,} \ appropriate orders^{be passedto tha\ effect'}

¶35

This Court is of^{the considered view that since the} learned counsel for^{the appellanthas informedthe} appellant that the^{case is coming up for hearingon} 03.O1.2025, and^{the appellant having been informed} about the same,^{has not instructed her counsel to} proceed with the case.

¶36

In view of the^{same, this Court has no other} option except^{to dismiss the case for default or non-} prosecutlon.

I I I Il

I l I

Accordingly, the Appea-l is dismis,,.ed lor default.

¶41

No order as to costs.

¶42

As a sequel, miscellaleous app1L,.:ittions pending

¶43

if any, shall stand closed

¶44

Sd/- K.^{SREE RAMAMURTHY} UTY^REGISTRAR \

/TTRUE^COPY//

I SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The )(lll Additional^{Chief Judge, City Civil C-ourt',H.cr/€rabad} 2 d""'CC^{t" rtf. R Madhavi Latha' Advocate IOPUC]} 3 5;; aa^{io sti < nnoop Kumar' Advocate toP-t19.1^.} 4 6;; aa^{i" s'i Cn RameshBabu' Advocate [oPUC]} 5 Two CD^CoPies

ADI</PSL

HIGH COURT

DATED:3010112025

JUDGMENT

CCCA.No.63 of 2007