Disposed¶23

N. Vijaya Kumar v. Sri E.V. Narasimha Reddy

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Sections 10 to 12

Telangana HC11 Jul 2025CC/745/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Contempt Case No.745 of 2025, decided 11.07.2025 by Justice Pulla Karthik; contempt alleging willful disobedience of order dated 04.12.2024 in W.P.No.34148 of 2024 (N. Vijaya Kumar v. E.V. Narasimha Reddy, Commissioner and Director of School Education); closed on recording compliance through proceedings Rc.No.1617/B2/2024 dated 20.05.2025; liberty reserved to petitioner to challenge the compliance proceedings; petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971; counsel: C Raja Sekhar Reddy for petitioner, GP for Services-I for respondent.

What did the court decide?

No punishment imposed; the Contempt Case was closed upon recorded compliance, with liberty left to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 20.05.2025 if aggrieved. ¶23

N. Vijaya Kumar Vs Sri E.V. Narasimha Reddy — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 745 OF 2025

¶7

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for their willful and deliberate, disobedience of the orders dated O411212024 in W.P. NO. 34148 ot 2024.

¶8

Between:

¶9

N. Vijaya Kumar, S/o. N. David, Aged about 42 Years, Unemployee, R/o H.No.4-2411 , Pocharam (V), Nagireddypet (M), Kama Reddy District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Sri E.V. Narasimha Reddy, Commissioner and Director of School Education, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶13

...CONTEMNOR

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. C RAJA SEKHAR REDDY

¶15

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - I

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

.:-:'-:-...,r.l.:;Jz /' ./

¶18

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTH]K

¶19

CONTEMPT CASE N0.745 0F 20.25

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

Alleging ,r,illful disobedience of the order dated O4. \2.,2024 passed bv this Conrt in W.p.No.34l4g of 2024.; the present Contempr Case is liled.

¶22

2l When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel [o r the petitioner submits that in compliance of the crrder dated 04.12.2024, the respondents have issued proceerlings vidt_. Rc.No. 1 6 1 7/ B2 / 2024, dated 20.05.2O25.

¶23

Recordin6.; the above made submission, the Conternpt Case is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the 1:,roceerlings dated 2O.05.202)5, if he is so aggrieved.

¶24

Sd/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA EIEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶25

SEC OFFICER

¶26

To,

¶27

l One CC to SRl. C RAJA SEKHAR REDtrT Advocate [OPUC]

¶28