Supreme Court of Telangana treated handled a contempt petition and writ petition simultaneously. Counsel for the petitioner lacked instructions, resulting in the closing of both proceedings without costs.
Both the writ petition and contempt case were closed. No orders for costs were made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
CONTEMPT CASE N OF 24
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.3191 OF 2024
c.c. No. 5840F 2024
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 197'1, to punish the respondents for willfully violating the orders of this Honble Court in W.P. NO.3191 OF 2O24 dated22-02-2024
Between:
W. Suvartha, Wo Maruthi, Age 22 yea$, Record Assistant, MAM (G), Government Junior College, Gosha Mahal, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
...Respondents
Counse! for the Petitioner: SRl. P: V. KRISHNAIAH
Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -l
I t t I I ; ! i:
I t I I f I I I l ! ! I
WRIT PETITION NO: 3191 O F 2024
Between:
W. Suvartha, W/o Maruthi, Age 22 years, Record Assistant, MAM(G), Government Junior College Gosha Mahal, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
...PETIT]ONER
AND
.RESPONDENTS
FHition undrrr Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancer; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief, more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia, declaring theproceedings No. No.OP-1 llMZ-11NRAt2023, dated 05.12.2023 issued by the 1"t Respondent as arbitrary, illeg;al, malafide, void and without ,jurisdiction and unconstitutional violating Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia apart from contrary to Telangana lnlermediate Subordinate Service Rules as well as G.O. Ms. No.81, Revenue Det'artment, dated 09.08.2023 and set aside the same and issue consequential directions to the 1st Respondent to allow the Petitioner to continue as Record Asr;istant which post the Petitioner was holdingprior to the issuance of the impugned Proceedings.
Btition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the Proceedinl;s No.OP-11/MZ-11NRN2023, dated 05.12.2023 issued by the 1st Respondent with a direction to continue the Petitioner as Record Assistant which post the Petitioner is holding prior to the issuance of the impugned Proceedings No.OP-1 1/MZ-11NRN2023, dated 05.12.2023 pending disposal of this Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Between:
.. Petitioners/Respondents
And
.. Respondents/Respondents
FHition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 22.02.2024 passed in l.A. No.1 of 2024 in Writ Petition No. 3191 of 2024.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. p V KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES t
The Court made the following COMMON ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T'HE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK
CONTEMPT CASE No. 584 of 2o.24 AND WRIT PETITION No.3191 of 2o24
THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER,
TWO THOUSAND AND TUIENTY FTYE
C.C.No.584 of 2O24 & W.P.No.3191 of 2O24
Between:
',
W.Suvartha
Petitioner
AND
Smt. B.Jayaprada Bai, Joint Directcr of Intermediate Education, Hyderabad and (3) others.
Respondents
COMMON O]sTDER :
Conterr:pt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order
passed by this Court in W.P.No.319l of 2024 dated 22.2.2024, and
seeking to punish the contemnors/respondents.
----.F-Yr
\
2
any;, shall stand closed. Thereshallbe no ord.eras to costs.
SD/. N SRIHARI PUTY
//TRUE COPY//
ON OFFICER
To,
kul/PSL
Tw
HIGH COIJRT
DATED:0!il12tZO2s
COMMON CIRDER
CONTEMPT gASE NO: S8a OF 202a
t THE s
f ? 4 Ft.fr ?07_$
*
AND
CLOSING TH]I BOTH WRIT PETITION AND
CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS a* pl"l's
W. Suvartha
Smt. B.Jayaprada Bai
PULLA KARTHIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
