Partly allowed

S. Krupakar Reddy v. Dr. Jyothi Budha Prakash, IAS

Telangana HC1 Jul 2025CC/2720/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court set aside the impugned dismissal proceedings dated 12.05.2011 against the petitioner following his acquittal in the underlying criminal appeal. The court directed the state to consider a representation regarding consequential benefits while leaving specific entitlements open.

What did the court decide?

Set aside impugned proceedings dated 12.05.2011. Direct respondent No. 1 to consider representation and pass appropriate orders within two months.

S. Krupakar Reddy Vs Dr. Jyothi Budha… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶7

WRIT PETITION No: 27984 OF 2024 and CONTEMPT CASE No.2720 OF 2 024

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 27984 OF 2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

9.Krupakar^{Reddy,S/o. Late SatyanarayanaReddy Aged 62 years, Occ} lormerly .Jr. Asst. (Retd) Motkur, Rio. 5-5-'l 1 1915911, Sri Sainath Colony. Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad-500070

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

1r Tte State of Telangana, Through its Special Chief Secretary Revenue (Regn.-l) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500

¶14

2 The Commissioner and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps, Registration Bhavan, Hyderabad-500

¶15

3 Dy. lnspector General, Registration and Stamps, Hyderabad Oio. CandlG of RandS Registration Bhavan, Hyderabad-500

¶16

District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Nalgonda District, NALGONDA500

¶17

E District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Yadagiri Bhongir, BHONOGIR

¶18

f) Sri,K.C. Prashanth Kumar, s/o not known, age not known Retired SubRegistrar, Office of Sub-Registrar, Huzurnagar Suryapet District

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particuiarly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the petitioner is entitled for

¶21

i) Treatment^{of suspension periodfrom OgOT '2007 to 30 07 2009 as on} d uty for^all PurPoses'

¶22

Treatment^{of out of employment period from 12 05'2011to 3'1 01 2020}

¶23

ii) as continuity^{in service for all purposes and payment of pay and} allowances^{uPto 31 01 '2020 '}

¶24

iii) Pay^{protectionand pay fixationsin the Revised Pay Scales' grant of} annual^{grade increments the date of my attaining age of} superannuation^{on 31-01-2020}

¶25

Restoration^{of senioritY and Promotionas Senior Assistant on Par with}

¶26

iv) th Kumar^{w.e.f.14-12-2007'}

¶27

my immediate^{junior Sri K C Prashan} retiral benefits^{basedon pay fixed}

¶28

Sanction^{of pensionary benefitsand}

¶29

v) the date^{of mY suPerannuation'}

¶30

as on^{31 .01 .2020.} al Grade^{Scalein the Category of Junior Assistant}

¶31

Sanction^{of SPeci}

¶32

vi) and in the^{category of Senior Assistant from 2013to}

¶33

from 1991^{to 1999} 2019

¶34

by holding^{the action ofthe respondentsinnot sanctioningthe} afolementioned^benefitsie '^{(i) to (vi) pursuant to his acquittedin Criminal} Appeal^{No.379 of 2011, dated 02 07 '2024 by the Hon'ble HighCourt} Telangana^{at Hyderabad with all consequential benefitsas being arbitrary'} illegal,^{unjust, discriminatoryand in violationof Articles14 and '16 of The} constitution^{of lndia and consequentialyset aside the proceedingsNo-} Et175OI2OO7^{dated'l 2-05-20'1'1 of the DistrictRegistrar' Nalgonda'}

¶35

IA NO:^{,t oF 2024}

¶36

petition under Section 151^{cpcprayingthat in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to} direct the^{respondentsto sanction the provisional pension with effectfrom} 01 .02.2020^{basedon the pay of the petitioneras on 12-052011 ' the date of} dismissar^{fromservice by suspending proceedingsNo. E/,'75012007dl'} 12.o5-2olloftheDistrictRegistrar'Nalgonda,pendingdisposaloftheabove Writ Petition.

¶37

lA NO: 1 o F 2025

¶38

Between:

¶39

' H8n,iifi 'B"Bl#llff $1",H"ir,+.,:Lffr?SL^{c h ier} secretary Reven ue

¶40

2 IP, gof,rissioner and lnspector General of negistration a-nJvi'n ilyoeraoaa-soo^Regiskation and Stamps,

¶41

Dy. lnspector General. n i no s he! istr;ffi^{'6t,T;8]il',il3*#-rt'3,nrs,Hvderabad} o/o ca n d r G or

¶42

4 District Registrar' Registration and stamps Nargonda District, NALGoNDA-

¶43

District Registrar, Registration and Stamps yadagiri Bhongir, BHONOGIR

¶44

AND

¶45

...PETITIONERS

¶46

1 S Krupakar Reddy. S/o. L 5^{jgsllt,t,J,#...lJ5s,."'t1,.";sssy5r'ffi 1,',i'r33/,os;'.:',J,f;} '8",s",i

¶47

2 Ret i red s u b_

¶48

3 :f;? ,?:a'#s:,:, SJfl ft : n,:1?" i il, j;fl:! ;,tn"rl;:, Hs,I:,

¶49

...RESPONDENTS

¶50

Qetition^{under section} I 51 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dated 04-10-2024 in wp.No.2 7gg4 0f 2024 anddismiss the Writ Petition.

¶51

Counset for the petitioner: SRI A.RAMA RAO

¶52

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to S: Gp FOR SERVICES-I

¶53

CONTEMPT CAS E NO: 2720 0F 2024

¶54

Petition under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971praying that the High court may be pleased to punish the contemnors/ respondents herein, in accordance with raw, for wiilfur disobedience and vioration of the order dated 04t10t2024 inW.p. No.27984 of 2O24.

¶55

r,,l

¶56

Between:s K ru pak ar Redd v,, s/o Late s atvana ravT 9 . T6iroJ,,in;,l 3'" I;f,"e"o,3;r, F.*;i[ Jr^{Asst (Cetd) Motkur''R/o5-5-11} vl"Mriur,prt,'n.'^{ui)o"i'n'o- 500 070}

¶57

...PETITIONER

¶58

AND

¶59

1 Dr Jyothi^{Budha Prakash,IAS' S/o and a-se} '9t^{"9Ytd:ff;"rt31tff6i2'"} i'Fidlii^{il;;;i,"n[ St't" or ielangana'secretar'at't}

¶60

2 ?I.ir,",'g^{jJl8X,i.',?,1i,i'-$P.i,:l:.TStl:il;:*fl8U,l],1?3"t8il#'":"131} 953, HYderabad-500^095'

¶61

3 G. Reoistration Mad^{h u s ud and ha n Red StamPs,dv t'ni"oToX,} "fli'r,Hinfi "U" "C' f^{o,A"* o*"nE't} iifi i;Uil;^{ahavan, HYberabad-5oooes}

¶62

4 Harikota Ravi. and Stamps^{Yadagiri Sio and age not enotli "3?ddtFi known rl'6'Coronvl Distnct.Registrar' Nabonda-508 FAC'Registration001}

¶63

...CONTEMNORS

¶64

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRI A'RAMARAO}

¶65

Counsel^{for the Respondents:GP FOR SERVICES-I}

¶66

TheCourt^{made the following: COMMON ORDER}

¶67

¶68

THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶69

WRIT PETITION N0.27984 0F 2024 AIttD CONTEMPT CASE No.272O oF 20.24

¶70

COMMON ORDER:

¶71

This Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of

¶72

Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

¶73

"...to issue a Wit, Order or Dtrection, more partiallarlL one tn the nature of Wit of Mandomus declanng the pLtitiotner ts enti ed. for (i) Treqttl.ent of suspenston pen"a loi oe.oi.zooi to so.oz.zoos o, ":n du-ty" -f:r atL purpojls^ -(u) ^Treatment^{oJ out o1 .mptogment period} from^12,O5.2011 to 3t.O^j.2O2O ", """"ti"it g ln serutce, for all p.urposes ond pagtnett of p.gy and altowanis upto 31.01.2020. (iii) PaA protectrcn ancl pag frattons in the Reuised pag ScrrLes, grant of annual qrad.e increments the date of mg attanntng age of superannuation on 31_Q1-2O2O (iu) Restiratii o1 "enioritg" anh promotion os Senlor Assistanl on pqr with my immediate junior Si K.C.prctshanth Kumor w.e.f. 14_1i_2o07 O) d";;;" oJ pensionary benefits and rettrat be,nefiti bor.a on pog jo.i or.-in Sl.Ol.ZOZO, ,n date of mg superannuatton and (ui) sinJtion "j ip""r"t Grade scale in th,e Category of Juntor Assisrani from 19d1 i,^-i-ggg and in the category of Senior Assistant from 2b13 b 2O1g bA hotding the action of the respondents in not sqnctioning tn, o1_"^iitio,ned beneJits i.e., (i) to (ui) pursuari to his acqutt.tea ii camiiat epp.i t'to szs of 2o11, dated 02.07.2024 bg the .Hon.ble High Court f"i;;;;"" at Hgderabad w.i.tlt all consequentictl be1efil.s aJ A.i"g "rOiiri;, tuegal, unjust, discriminatory qnd tn , uiotition of A;icb.s li'ana 16 of The Constitulton of India and consequentially set asid.e thi proceed.tngs No. E/1750/2007 aatea |Z_OS_ZOi| of tie Dstrr"t nigt or, Natgonda and pass... "

¶74

2' In the present writ petition, this court while ordering Notice before Admission on 04. IO.2024 granted the following

¶75

interim order:

¶76

"Learned Government pleader takes notice on behalf of respondents and seeks time to hle counter. Pending disposal of the Writ petition, the respondents are direc_ted to sanction provisional pension to the petitioner in terms of G.O.Rt.No.1O97, Fin. (FW:pen-I) Department dated 22.06.2000"

.-. "--'1

PK,J wo 279a4-2O25⁸ⁿ C. 2720²⁰²⁴

¶81

According^{to the petitioner'the respondentsdid not} comply^{with the interim order of this CourtTherefore'the} petitioner^{filed Contempt Case No'2720 of 2024 for violation} of the^{Court's order da:ed 04 lO'2O24'}

¶82

4 Therefore,^{both the Contempt Case and the Writ Petition} are taken^{uP for disPosal'}

¶83

Heard^{SriA Rama Rao' learned counsel forthe} petitioner^{and the iearndd GovernmentPleader for Services I} Perused^{the materialavailable on} for resPondent^{Nos lto 5} record.

¶84

counsel^{for the Petltlonersubmits that the} 6. L,earned initially^{appointedas Junior Assistanton} petitioner^was 10.12.1991^{andwhile he was working atSub-Registrar's} Offrce,Ramannapet,helvasplacedundersuspensionuide proceedings^{datecl 09'07'2007' consequentto registration of a} case in^{CrimeNo 13/ACB-HR/2007against him on the file of} Anti-Corruption^{Bureau, HyderabadRange'However'the} suspension^{orderof the petitioner was revoked by respondent} No.4 uide^{proceedingsdated 30 07'2OO9 and accordingly' the} petitioner rejoined^{duty on 3l 'O7'2OO9 'After investigation'}

¶85

PK,J wp 2'7984 2025 & Cc 2720 2024

¶86

¶87

charge sheet was filed before the learned I Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad uide C.C.No.29 of 2OO8 and uid-e order dated 23.03.2011, the petitioner was found guilty and convicted for the offences alleged against him. Consequently, the petitioner was dismissed from service without any enquiry, by proceedings dated 12.O5.201 1. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed Crl.A.No.379 of 2Oi l before this Court and by order dated O2.O7.2024, the same was,.allowed ald the conviction order dated 23.03.201 1 wag set aside. Further, during the pendency of the aforesaid Criminal Appeal, the petitioner attained age of superannuation on completion of 5g years as of 31.O1.2020. It is further submitted that the petitioner was neither employed nor engaged in any gainful business or venture during the period of suspension or the period he was out of employment. It is further submitted that the petitioner was dismissed from service by proceedings dated l2.OS.2Oll on the ground that he was convicted in ACB case uid_e C.C.No.29 of 2008 dated 23.03.2O11 passed by the learned Specia_l Court and the petitioner was acquitted from the said ACB case uide judgment dared O2.OT.2O24 passed by this

¶88

PK,J Wp-27984 2025^& Cc 2720-2021

¶89

¶90

¶91

Court in Cr1.A.No.379^{of 2Ol1. Therefore, learned counsel} pravs this Court to^{set aside the impugned proceedings' dated} 12.O5.2011 and^{direct therespondents toreleaseall} consequential benefits^{in view of petitioner'sacquittal in the} ACB case. In support^{of his contentions, learned counsel for} the petitioner has^{placed reliance on the judgmentsrendered} by the Hon'ble^{Supreme Court inGoventmentof Andhra} Prcrdesh and another^{v. B.Jagieeaan Rao1l ShobhaRo,m} Raturi a. Haryana^{Vidgut Prasaro:n Nigo:rn Limitedand} others2 and. Ram^{Lal v, State of Ro,jasthans'}

¶92

Per contra, learned^{GovernmentPleader forthe} respondents submits^{that while the petitioner was working at} Sub-Registrar's^{Office, Ramannapet,he was remanded to} judicial custody by the ACB^officials .on^{the allegation that he} had accepted a bribe^{of Rs.4,000/ onO5'O7 '2OO7'} Consequently', the^{petitioner was placed undersuspension on} Og.O7 .2OO7 . However,^{the suspensionorder was revokedon} 30.07 .2OOg and accordingly,^{the petitioner rejoineddutyon} 31.O7.2OO9. Basing on the^{conviction in the criminalcase}

¶93

I (2014) 13 SCC 239

¶94

2 2016 (16) SCC 663

¶95

3 2023 INSC 104'Z

¶96

PK,J Wp 27984 2O2S & Cc 2720_2024

¶97

¶98

uide order dated 23.O3.2O11 ln C.C.No.29 of 2OOB, respondent No.4 issued dismissal order uide proceedings dated 12.05.20 1i. Aggrieved by the conviction in aforesaid C.C., the petitioner filed Crl.A.No.3T9 of 20l1 before this Court. While matter stood thus, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 3l.Ol.2O2O. Subsequently, by order dated O2.O2.2O24, this Court acquitted the petitioner from the ACB Case. it is further submitted that in view of interim orders passed by, this Court on O4.1O.2O24, the department sent necessar-v provisional pension proposa-ls on 23.12.2024 to the Accountant General, State of Telangana, who in turn, returned the pension proposals uide letter dated 14.O2.2025 seeking the proceedings relating to the petitioner's reinstatement into service after dismissal and permission to treat him as retiied on 3l .Ol .2O2O. Consequently, the respondents have forwarded letter dated 19.O3.2O25 informing about petitioner,s deemed reinstatement and deemed retirement in pursuance of interim order passed by this Court on O4.1O.2O24. It is further submitted that the respondents have also addressed letters to Director General of police, Anti-Corruption Bureau,

¶99

Pl<,J 6 Wp 27984 2025 &, Cc 2720 2021

¶100

Telangana, on 04.1L2O24, 30.11.2024 and 11.12.2024 inquiring whether any appeal liled before the Honble Supreme Court against the judgment dated O2.O7 .2024 passed by this Court in Cr1.A.No.379 of 2011, however no information has been received frorri the ACB officials so fa_r. Further, the petitioner disabled himself from rendering service on account of his conviction and since he remained out of service, he is not entitied for any benehts or notional seniority. In support of his contentions, Iearned Government Pleader placed reliarrce on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Resente Bank of India u. Bhopal Singh Panchala, and Union of India and. others a. Jaipal Singhs.

¶101

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and on perusal of record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner was dismissed from service by proceedings dated 12.O5.2O11 consequent to his conviction by the learned Special Court uid"e order dated 23.O3.2071 in C.C.No.29 of 2008. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred Cr1.A.No.379 of 2011 before this Court.

¶102

4 (1994) 1 SCC s41 s (2004) 1 SCC 121

¶103

-q-

¶104

PK,J wp-279a4-2025 & Cc 2720 2024

¶105

¶106

This Court, upon hearing both sides and examining the material on record, allowed the said Criminal Appeal and acquitted the petitioner uid.e order dated O2.O7.2024. Here it is relevant to extract paragraph Nos.9, 10, l l and 12 of

¶107

B.Jagjeevan Rao,s case, which reads as under:

¶108

'9. Hauing stated the pinciple, we shcdl now aduert to th.e Rule position. Rule 25(1) being ,eleuint is ,*r"a"r"i#rtiri

¶109

-_"25.^{Special procedurein Certain Cases:} Notlaithstanding an!.lthing ^c.ontained^{tn' Rute 20 toRuLe 24 (1) uthere} penatty is imposed. on a Gouentment Setuant on tne glouna of conduct authoitA uthich has mag ted consid.er to his .."i:,:?::: the ";;;;;;.h:;:s!,,"tn" ab.ipur,ry -circumstances^of 'J^the .. !^crie ..r u^{ancl make such} orders thereon as it deems fit .,, .

¶110

The requirement of the-,so,id Rub, as it scprns, rs th.lt thp conducl of :,7trI::::X:;fr'.'l[!20^*or.o "on ui,.tio,- i, t h7 ")'^'i'i1i "oo,n, ono,n" ;**ix.i;,.?xii:ii"r;:#ii;:ii'1"'i;"',:;{ii^:ifr .or;heActa;;s;;;;;,:ff ff :|zu:;;:!,::Jl:!1,:;:1,-,:r"Xi::;,,"yjt ';';."';k^-#:3;[" ::; ^' ;il'4, f i o't "a s'- b ;''' ;',' "] ;. i' rere rrins to the s., #", rj",J il,luL :: " :i,, ;:;,,';,r,3 ;;!, "^{: !,: ;, ;;r:,- *t ot h cd ; r tu mi n}

¶111

"l O What i.s reallu releuant the c:rYu:t of the gouetnnLent seruant trthtch has ted to his "on i.ti^2: on d 'nntinal cltorrr-- Now in lhis cas.., the responclenr has been torna ,ln o/'r'orntptton bLt a t'nmrnol roLtn. tJnil the so,a .orui"r,oi,"'s "i iirii"nl,"0 od,isable to retoin such ,";"::".:pltll?'" ":^{othcrltigher('out1-} it mog not be tsa-,1n. .u"iii;; ;p';:;":,,:,;::i';.,1),;:;,",1,""12,;;,t":,::fj:r:ii ,,,",'., , rcu@ued in such a manner rhor he su11rrs ". ir"ira,i" "i,!;.iTJ:?;;'#,ili'^{in!':::'.:''r'gnro r quashinsthes ho w- cause} teet,.th.er",r;;";;;';;;';"::Xfi:L:J,5,,#T::;,"::ri?o,Etr1r* oppellant has exptain.ed thlt though n" ,i*|)]i',ri.Tnrl,,rr,l had come :,::':r'i;."';;fil,7"::!:i,:,:; ia';;;i;;,1::^{#i:;:,, oun} or^t hP thP sentctce lt is statPcl that^-afler aaas,iiit;;";";i;;',:;:7";,i;i;i:i;tritr#:riii;,;;,;:i,iTi; obtainiig t.g"i ;i"i";ihi*:.;Y"n''* ji i:f|:.":, - and tn ans euenr, the aa"i,, "[,' ,,"i',! ,"'7)i," lhe oction

¶112

Regard beinq had to the cnunriation of law atd kceprng in "dforesatd utcw the expeclcd standatd of odminLstrot@n. .o,,ui.iioi ^oi',in" charge oJ corntption has to be utewed seinusly ct"a ""ir.^ ,i'"r"ri"ri" enplogs7 lanns: be cotrLDellc.] t2 t.ake an emploAee to.i ir-'"".*'o". f| ""rLul[ed, .l.herefore,an the High Co.un has cteailg effed in its interpretation of Rute 25(l ) ot(l lttrther committed illegatitA in nit keepng in min(l the tlstirLctrctn be:tLueen staA oJ

¶113

¶114

PK,J wp 27941 2025 &, Cc 2720 2021

¶115

¶116

conuiction and suspension of sentence as enuisaged under Sectlon 389(1) of the Code.

¶117

ln the result, the oppeql ts dlloued, the ludgment and order of the Hiqh Cour1, being sertsitiuely suscepttble, are set aside- There sho,Ll he no'ord<:r as lo cosls- "

¶118

Further, it is pertinent to refer to Proceedings

¶119

No.E I a27O I 2024 dated 19.O3.2025, wherein, pursuant to the petitioner's acquitta-l in the ACB case, the issue of deemed reinstatement into service and permission to retire from service was considered by the authorities for the purpose of sanctioning provisional pension uide letter dated 19.03.2O25 In light of the same, and considering the lega1 principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited above, this Court is of the view that the impugned order dated 12.O5.2OI1 is not sustainable in law and is liable to be set aside.

¶120

Moreover, the record discloses that the petitioner made a representation to respondent No.1 on 24.07 .2024 wherein he requested for grant of consequential benefits. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it would be appropriate to direct respondent No. 1 to consider the aforementioned representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶121

PK,J wp 279a4-2025 & Cc 2720 2024

¶122

¶123

¶124

I r. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of setting aside the impugned proceedings No.E/l7SO/20O7 dated 12.05.2011 issued by respondent No.4 and respondent No. i is directed to consider the representation, dated 24.O7.2024, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in the light of lega.l principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in B.Jagjeeaan Rco, case (1 supraf and Shobha Ro;m Raturi,s case {2 supra}, strictlv in accordance with law, after a_ffording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as Lxpeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two (2) months from the date ol. receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy thereof to the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed arly opinion on the petitioner,s entitlement to specific service or monetary benefits and he is at liberty to pursue further remedies if aggrieved by the decision of the authorities made pursuart to this direction.

¶125

In view of the disposal of the Writ petition, no further orders need to be passed in the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

¶126

PK,J wp 27984 2023 ?n Cc 2720 2024

¶127

¶128

Miscellaneous petitions^pending, if^{any, shall stand}

¶129

closed. There shall be^{no order as to costs}

¶130

To,

¶131

SD/-A.V.S.^PRASAD DEPUTY, REGISTRAR sec{*f,Brrrcen

¶132

//TRUE COPY//

¶133

1 . The Special^{ChiefSecretaryRevenue (Regn-l)Department' Secretariat'} Hyderabad,^{State of Telangana}

¶134

The commissioner^{and lnspector Generalof Registrationand stamps,} Registration Bhavan'^HYderabad'

¶135

3 The Dv. lnspector^{General, Registrationand Stamps' HyderabadOio C & lG} - of R &'S Registration Bhavan, Hyderabad

¶136

4.TheDistrictRegistrar,RegistrationandStampsNalgondaDistrict'Nalgonda

¶137

The District^{Registrar, Registration and Stamps YadagiriBhongir'Bhongir'}

¶138

A Sri ur .tvothi Budha Prakash, lAS,^{Secretary, Revenue(Regn-l)Department,} " Sirte oit"iingrna, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 022'

¶139

Sri Dr. Jvothi Budha^{Prakash, lAS. The commissionerand lnspectorGenera-l} ' ;i'#stI;iii;"";d" bi;;E: n"gi'ii'ii* Bhivan' 5-3-e53' Hvderabad-500 095

¶140

S,sriG,IvtadhusudhanReddy,Dy.lnspectorG-eneralReoistrationandStamps,Medchat lvtalkajgiri.^{OiI-'b"'rnO -iC-'of nand'S"RegistrationBhavan} Hyderabad-500 095.

¶141