Contempt case filed by 52 medical officers alleging non-compliance with a writ court order directing sanction of pensionary benefits. The Government reported compliance via detailed speaking orders issued by Memo No. 6112/EI/2025 dated 07.08.2025, and the court closed the contempt case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s21
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR'THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1412 oF 2025
Contempt Case under Section10 to12 of Contemptof Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents herein for willful and deliberate disobedienceof the orders of this Court dated 30-04-2025passed in W.P.No.9206ot 2023.
Between:
{
AND
...Respondents
Counsel for ther Petitioners: SRI CH.GANESH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT CASE No.1412 of 2025
ORDER:
Heard Sri Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing on behalf of respondents.
3
extracted hereunder:
"The writ petition is allowed and the Respondents are directed to consider the request of thepetitioners to process the pension proposals of the petitioners for issuance of the pension payment order sanctioning the pension and pensionary benefits by duly computing.the service from the date of initial appointment of the petitioners for the purpose of sanction of pension, within a period of three (03) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance to law, duly taking into consideration the observations of the
2 sN. ' cc l4t2 202s
Apex court and Others Courts in the various judgments (referred to and extracted above) and pass a;lpropriate orders. However, there shall be no order as; to costs".
J
SN. J cc t4t2 2025
compliance to the directions of this court,
to costs
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand
closed.
Sd/- A. PRATHIMA
PUTY REGIST
//TRUE COPY/
CTION OFFICER
[OPUC]
the of Telangana.
To, 1. One CC to Sri CH.Ganesh, Advocate [OPUC]
I :! iI
/
/
/
HIGH COURT
DATED i12l0gl2025
ORDER
GC.No.14.12 of 2025
jfr
C)
2 I JAr{ 20e0 .Z
(.. )
+
: 'r
CLOSINGi THE CONTEMPT CASE
^N
G d{""
&,6.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the orders dated 30.04.2025 in W.P. No. 9206 of 2023 directing processing of petitioners' pension proposals had been complied with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr.C.Narmada and 51 other medical officers of Ayurvedic/Homeopathy dispensaries
Smt. Christina Z.Chongthu Garu
Smt. K. Hymavathi Garu
Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania Garu
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
