Appeal against a trial court decree; appellant's counsel stated the subject matter was settled outside court and sought permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission granted and the appeal dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3217 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUIT N O: 30 OF 2007
Appeal under section 96 of C. P.C against the Judgment and DecreeDaled 2911112006 made in O.S.No.15 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the SeniorCivil Judge, Suryapet.
Between:
Kandibanda Prabhakar Rao S/o Satyarnayana, Occ: Business and Managing Partner R/o H.No.12-14311 , Bolisetti Narsaiah Rice Mill Bazar, Kodad Town, Nalgonda District.
...Appellant(Defendant)
AND
Mathamarri Srinivasa Rao S/o Ramakrishna Rao, Occ: Cultivation, R/o H.No.5-1-59/2, Suggalavari Thota, Khammam Town, Khammam District.
... Respondent
l.A. NO: 't OF 2007(ASMP. NO: 95 OF 2007)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceeding lncluding execution of the decree dated 29.11.2006 in OS No.15 of 2003 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, Pending disposal of the appeal.
Gounsel for the Appellant :Sri Chetluru Sreenivas
Counsel for the Respondent: Sri J Prabhakar
The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE 1.{ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKAR.AMJI
A.S.No.3O of 2OO7
JUDG MENT:
The Appeal Suit has been filed by the appellant/defendant aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2006 in O.S.No.15 of 2003 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Suryapet.
4, Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall
sta nd closed .
Sd/- K. SAILESHI DE.PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// t SECTION OFFICER
To
ADK/PR w
--------.!+ ---*:i
HIGH COURT DATED:1410212025
JUDGMENT
AS.No.30 of 2007
-'
--f
S
,St'"
,,, ::
,i -) 3OAPilM Z
\iY
<br>{-sP Tc$
DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
G"d"b &{'
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kandibanda Prabhakar Rao
Mathamarri Srinivasa Rao
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
