Appeal by electricity board against a money recovery decree in favour of the respondent contractor. No representation appeared for either side on successive listings; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13217 )
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUIT No: 228 ot 2007
Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 28-08-2006 passed in O.S.No.12 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, FTC, Kothagudem.
Between:
...Appellants/Defenda nts
AND
M/s Numan Engineering Works, Paloncha rep. by its Prop: Sri Moulana Ghulsan, S/o Khaja Hussain, Age:35 years, Occ: Business R/o Paloncha, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District.
...RespondenUPlaintiff
Gounsel for the Appellants: Sri Mir Aqueel Ali (No representation)
Counsel for the Respondent: Party-in Person (No representation)
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE FIONOURABLESRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUITNo.228 0F 2007
JUDGMENT:
This appeal suitis directedagainst the decreeand judgmentdated 28.08.2006 inO.S.No-12of 1999, passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge IFTC),Kothagudem, wherebythe suit for recovery of money, hasbeen decreed. Challengingthe impugned decree and judgment, the appellants/defendants/TSNPDCL(Telangana State Northern PowerDistributionCompany Limited) preferred this appeal' 2. None appearedfor the appellants or respondent' 3. Asper the ProceedingSheet, on 05'02'2025 and 06'022025 as there was norepresentationfor the appellants,the matter was directed to be listed on07.02.2025under the caption 'For Dismissal'.Despite listing the matter'for dismissal" none has representedthe appellants. This position isindicating that the appellantshad lost interest in the Appeal and thisCourl left withno optionbut to dismissthe Appeal for non-prosecution.
As a sequel,pending tniscellaneousapplications' if any' shall
stand closed.
t Sc/- K. SAI ESHI DEPUTY REGI TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\ SEC:'TION OFFICER
To,
I
*uoftn M-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1UA212025
JUDGMENT
AS.No.228 of 2007
C\ l rrE sLl /-(:
?
oo
24 APB 2025 j,,]
*
,-1.r'1;irE-!
THE APPEAL SUIT IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
l
@
2l
4l
4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, rep. by its Chairman
The Chief Engineer, Transmission, APSEB
The Chief Engineer, Transmission, Lines and Sub Stations, APSEB
The Chief Engineer Electricity, Operation, Warangal Zone, APSEB
The Superintending Engineer, Transmission Lines and Sub Stations, APSEB
M/s Numan Engineering Works, rep. by its Prop: Sri Moulana Ghulsan
N.Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
