Appeal suit against a judgment and decree in a title suit was dismissed for default as neither the appellant nor counsel appeared when the matter was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I ;
132171
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, .---_THETWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUIT No: 1000of 2O02
Appeal filedunder Section 96 of C P C' aggrievedby the Judgmentand Decree dated06-07-1996 passed in O S No 3'1 of 1986 on the file of the Court of the SubordinateJudge at Bodhan'
Between:
S/o. Rajalingaiah,Age: 50 years'Occ:Business' VangaPalliNagabhushanam' Hindu. R/o.YellareddY'
...APPellanUPlaintiff
AND
t
7
./7
Respondents 3 to g are brought on relgfq ?g LRs ofthe deceased 2 as per tne Court Orde. dated 04_06_"2002 i n CMP.No.21 138 of 2001
...Responde nts/Defendants
Counset for the Appellant: Sri Mohd Azizullah Khan
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2: None Appeared
Counsel for the Respondents No.3 to g: Sri G. Rama Sharma
The Court dilivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUIT No.1000 0F 2002
JUDGMENT:
This appeal hasbeen filed by the appellant-plaintiff aggrieved by theJudgmentand Decree dated 06'07'1996in O.S.No.31 of'1986 passed by the learned SubordinateJudge at Bcidhan.
default. No costs
As a sequel,pending miscellaneous applications, if any'
Shall standcl
UMAR sd/- T. KRTSHNA DEPUTYRE ISTRAR
//TRUECOPYII
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
kam/ghY(
HIGH COURT
DATED:28 t01t2025
.J'
<br>1$(
?i,tilr2[[ a
* *
l)
rri l', ,r-O
<
JUDGMENT
AS.No.1000 of 2002
THE APPEAL SUIT IS DISMTSSED FOR DEFAULT
6.'& Y+ ffi>,
Vanga Palli Nagabhushanam
Vangapalli Srinivas
C. Pedda Mallaiah
Smt. Chenna Papavva
Chenna Ramulu
Chenna Sudhakar
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
