Single judge of Telangana HC disposed of WP No. 17481 of 2016 by dismissing it for non-prosecution, as petitioner failed to appear despite listing for dismissal, closing pending applications.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEIIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 17481 OF 2016
Between:
M/s. LakshmiNarsimhaTransport,, a registered partnershipfirm, rep. by its ManagingPartner, Nallella Ravinder, S/o. Shankaraiah, aged about 40 years, Fi/o.H.No.'1-'16/3,Abbapur Village, Mulugu Mandal, WarangalDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus orany other appropriate writ declaringthat the actionof the respondentcorporation in issuing the adhoc tendernotice in Proc.No.Movtlstage1112015-16,dated31.05.20'16relatingto the entrustment of the transportationof food grains lo others when the transport contract for the year 2016 - 17has alreadybeen awardedand subsistingwith the petitioner, is arbitrary,illegal and malafide and consequently direct the respondent corporation to forbearfrom proceeding further with the said Adhoc tender notice and further direct therespondent corporationto entrust the workof transportationof food grains for theyear 20'16- 1 7 to the writ petitioner alone and grant
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2o16(WPMP. NO: 21487 0F 2016)
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit-fired in support of the peiitio;, In" Higr, court may n" prerrlJ to grart stay of all furlher proceedings incruding entruitment of transportation work of food grains to third parties pursuant to the adhoc tender notic€r rssued by the 2nd respondent inproc.No. Movt/Stage w2o1s- 16, dated 31.05 20i6, ou,iaing disposal of the writ petition, and grant
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES
Counsel for the Respondents: A JAGAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIEEK.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.17481 ofZOLG
ORDER:
This writ petition is comingfor hearing since 2016. Qn 03.09.2024, when thematter was called,there was no representation on behalf ofthe petitioner, and therefore,the matter was directed to belisted on 17 .O9.2O24underthe caption "for dismissal". Today,when the matter is called, there is no representationon behalf of the petitioner'It seems that the petitioner isnot interested to prosecutethis case.
-_ - _ pgtitioq,-*Isil-glei]9 clo-sed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSI GISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 10912024
ORDER
i /l r
(
)q (
,.
t )
WP.No.17481 of 2016
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
I
A
44/
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition declaring the adhoc tender notice illegal would proceed in the absence of petitioner representation.
What is the appropriate order when a writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Lakshmi<sup>NarsimhaTransport, rep. by Nallella Ravinder
Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Rep. by Vice Chairman and Managing Director
The Joint Collector and Ex-Officio Executive Director, Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Warangal
Sri Justice K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
