Writ petition challenging non-allotment of 2BHK flats promised in lieu of acquired land. Court directed respondents to consider representation and pass reasoned orders within eight weeks.
Direction to consider representation and pass reasoned orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 9307 OF 2024
Between:
....,PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to ISSUE a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Orders declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not allotting appropriate units of 2BHK Flats as per Petitioners' entitlement at Town Survey No.76, Ward No.4B, Old Kattelamandi Slum, Nampally Village and Tahsil, Hyderabad, in spite of submitting Representation dated 29.O2.2024 as arbitrary, illegal, against to the Principles of Natural Justice and Article 14, 19,21 and 3004 of Constitution of lndia and
consequently direct theRespondent Nos.2to 4 to allot appropriateunits of 2BHK Flats to Petitioners asper their entitlementat their preferential location at Town Survey No.76, WardNo.48, old Kattelamandi Slum, NampallyVillageand Tahsil, Hyderabad at the earliest.
|.A.NO:1 OF2024
Petition Undersection 151 cPC praying that in the circumstancesstated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto DIRECT the RespondentNos.2to 4 to immediately allot 2BHK Flats to Petitioner asper their entitlementat their preferential locationat Town Survey No.76,ward No.48, Old KattelamandiSlum,NampallyVillage and Tahsil,Hyderabadat the earliest,pendingdisposal of the above writ petition'
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUJITH JAISWAL
Counsel for theRespondents: SRI SOMUSRINIVAS REDDY,AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court madethe following ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEK. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.9307 OF 2024
ORDER:
Heard Sri Sujith Jaiswal, learnedcounsel for the petitioners and Sri Somu Srinivas Reddy,learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue. Perused therecord.
same. Therefore, thepresent Writ Petition.
2
Revenue, on instructions, would submit that the2nd respondentwitl consider the written representation dated29.02.2024 submittedby the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordancewith law.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,
pending in the writ petition stand closed.
./
SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,) ,TRUE COPY// I,ir.--.U SECTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP 6
HIGH COURT
DATE D: 1 010412024
ORDER
WP.No.9307 of 2024
11 1HE 5 14 Ic
J
f,
(J 0 5 ,tuu nu
o2
{
DISPOSING OF THEW.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
.<\rr
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities violated the promise to allot 2BHK flats after acquiring property and failed to act on representations?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
S.Dara Singh
Gurdeep Kaur
State of Telangana
District Collector and MAGISTRATE, Hyderabad District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad Division
Mandal Revenue Officer, Nampally
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
